Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is major league copium. The fact is that Trump’s opponent got way more votes in 2020 than in 2024, and had the blue turnout in 2024 equaled what it was in 2020, he would not have won in 2024. Period.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Great! We can relish the fact that he didn’t win over the majority of Americans as our country descends into a fascist hellhole run by billionaires, war hawks and rapists.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

    just to be clear, this isn’t really a failing of the dems per say, not to say they didn’t have issues, they did. But this was a global shift away from incumbency. This seems to be more of a response to covid and inflation more than anything else possibly could’ve influenced it.

    Lucky break for trump, dems just have to come back stronger i guess.

  • renegadespork@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The only thing of note here is that since the winner got <50%, then I’m guessing 3rd party votes were slightly higher this election.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      1.7% in 2024.
      1.9% in 2020.
      5.7% in 2016.
      1.7% in 2012.
      1.4% in 2008.

      2024 is not the outlier. It’s mostly about how well the other major party candidate does.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So, 4% less in 2024 than in 2016, the last time he won. That by itself stands in pretty stark contrast to those who want to blame his victory on people who voted for a third party.

        Trump won in 2024 chiefly because millions upon millions of Dems who voted in 2020 stayed home in 2024. That’s the reality.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Trump won in 2024 chiefly because millions upon millions of Dems who voted in 2020 stayed home in 2024. That’s the reality.

          probably also a mix of lack of accessible voting, so the soy peeps who are bitching and moaning right now, are probably in the crowd of people that didn’t vote (or just actually busy people, idk)

          and malaise towards the incumbency (global phenomenon)

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You all need to get your “Fuck Trump” flags made and start driving around with them for the next 4 years.

  • DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Democratic party is a lost cause. They NEVER take any responsibility for their actions. What they did this election should even be illegal. They had no primary, so as a Democratic voter, I had no choice in who I was voting for. They picked my candidate for me, and it wasn’t even the incumbent! What’s the point of a democracy where my vote doesn’t matter, because THEY decide who I have to vote for? It’s stupid! They keep doing it over and over. Before, they threw Bernie under the bus and backed Hillary whether we liked it or not. They keep making the same dumb mistakes over and over because they just don’t care about working class people

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What they did this election should even be illegal

      illegal how? they’re a private party, their own rules don’t require them to hold a primary. Even if they wanted to do so, it was most definitely too late, should they have held one prior? probably.

      They had no primary, so as a Democratic voter, I had no choice in who I was voting for.

      man you guys need to learn what irony is. Also just to be clear, like 10 million people ever vote in primaries, so uh. Good luck? I guess? It’s not even representative to begin with lmao.

      What’s the point of a democracy where my vote doesn’t matter

      i mean it objectively does, but ok.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They did have a primary.

      And Hillary won her primary popular vote against Bernie and you’re still pissed about it so seems like the method isn’t the problem for you, it’s that they (“they” being Democrats according to the party rules) don’t pick whoever you like.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The primary where she bought out the entire DNC and was in control of them? The same primary where the DNC worked together to stop Bernie and sabotage his campaign, even going so far as to contemplate attacking him for being Jewish? The primary where the chair apologised to Bernie for fucking him over?

        Oh yeah, totally democracy in action.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a plurality and not a majority, pretty far from a mandate. It’s a legal win.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Usually, “mandate” used to mean overwhelming support from the majority. If these percentages hold up, donvict has a plurality. Even if he had a bare majority with Kamala and him having ~1.5% delta, it’s not like it is some real mandate, either…

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean his vote share went down, he still has more votes than kamala.

      So they don’t need to say anything he still won the popular core

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is a ridiculous argument. Orange man won the electoral college, got the most votes, won the senate, house of reps, the presidency, and the supreme court. What more is there to lose?

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Plenty of coping from the liberal corporate media, instead of admitting that liberals abandoned the working class to court the monied interests.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        idk why people keep yapping about abandoning the working class, it mostly just seems like a dogwhistle to a general dissatisfaction that never seems to go away.

        People were doing the same shit before biden dropped out, saying they would support someone else, like kamala. That happened, and then they didn’t.

        how would the liberals court the working class? would electing a fucking immigrant factory worker do it? At what point does the working class actually go “you know what, i agree, i will vote for this person” because the problem is, you can’t just put some guy in the seat, we did that with trump, it was a horrendous mistake, and trump should have some idea of how this stuff works.

        You need someone politically educated and experienced, capable of representing the people, like biden. There’s a reason he got so much legislation through the government, even with how polarized it is right now.

        unless of course, you want to overthrow the government, and install a dictator. That would also work.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It really didn’t have much to do with abandoning anyone. It didn’t matter what democrats proposed at all. The vast majority of people answers they were dissatisfied with America in exit polls. The economy is doing fine on paper but people don’t feel that way. It was the inability to distance from Biden and provide actual radical solutions to things that got them voted down.

        At this point it has nothing to do with working class policies. It has everything to do with voter dissatisfaction and pandering to moderates.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yep. The “liberal media” kept up a drum beat with the inflation and of course did next to nothing to tell the low info the real source and it wasn’t all inflation.

        • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The economy doing fine means nothing for 99.9% of people. All that means is rich people made money. People have seen a decrease in their pockets

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The economy doing fine means nothing for 99.9% of people.

            this isn’t actually true. The economy just leads the people in most circumstances. 6 Months from now the economy will be doing better than it was now, and people won’t be struggling as much. Not due to trump, amusingly enough.

            Also inflation is irrelevant, you can’t really just undo inflation. Sure you could just, not do it. But good luck with that one. Inflation is really just a mechanism to offset economic dysfunction, and broaden the impact of it. Such that you don’t have a complete global collapse of trade for example.

            • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              40 minutes ago

              Not sure why everyone keeps suggesting that the economy will do well under trump. It will only do well if he doesn’t do anything. But the deportations alone will be a disaster.

              You’re talking about entire towns losing their farming and dairy communities overnight, not good. Same is true of healthcare workers and food service. Housing prices might double.

              And if he does the tariffs, we’re cooked. Recession would happen the very next day no question. So he has like 5 different ways he already plans on taking the economy, he just needs to try one of them and we’ll be in recession.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The third dimension of the political compass is radical vs. moderate. People want more radical change, and the Democrats didn’t meet them there.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Exactly. In a high dissatisfaction environment, you must do your best to distance from the status quo which is why Trump got elected twice. It’s not that democrats are proposing bad policies, it’s that they’re only associated with changes that don’t mean much to average people. They represent the status quo far too much to be interesting.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      He lost last time and we let him take it. We dont have to keep letting him steal the office

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I actually prefer him wining the popular vote. At least this time it’s what most Americans (that are willing to show up) want.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      …or at least voted for. It’s becoming unclear whether it’s what they actually wanted, but it’s too late for regret now.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What they wanted was for their 7,000lb full size truck they use to commute to their office job to cost less than $100 to fill up, while having good enough sound insulation in their walls that they don’t hear the screams from the collateral damage that might unfortunately need to happen.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        it beats an electoral win, popular loss, and another 4-8 years of election fraud bullshit. Plus now he actually to some degree, has to be held responsible to the people. So this likely means the next election will flip backwards if there is a general perception of dissatisfaction in his abilities, which i expect there will be, in some capacity. His current cabinet picks are a fucking clownshow.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean, given the outcome is the same, I rather democracy to actually work instead of whatever the electoral college is.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yea but he has 100% of the control now so it doesn’t matter unfortunately.

        • bunchberry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          You are claiming that Trump automatically wins if nobody votes. That’s objectively not how US elections work. He still has to get the plurality of votes to win. People who do not cast votes don’t automatically support Trump, it just doesn’t sway the election at all. Please stick to the facts and not to the fake news. Election misinformation is not cool.

        • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah like those people who voted for the people actively funding a genocide that somehow believe the vote they were casting was for less genocide.

          That is an amazing brain trick.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            this is my favorite israel palestine talking point, instead of actually doing something about the issue, or like, discussing actual things actually happening, people just bitch and moan about semantics instead.

            Who gives a fuck whether or not voting for kamala was a vote for genocide, or whether or not abstaining, and therefore helping trump get elected was also a vote for genocide, go do literally fucking anything for the cause.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Only 33% of eligible voters actually voted against Trump. 66% either agree with him or don’t care.

      • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yup, just 71 million or so goddam people voted for a narcissistic grifter felony with daddy issues. Fuck.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Maybe a percentage of those votes were because of this, but you can’t actually believe that 71 million people voted for him because he somehow represents the working class better than the dems would. The vast majority people who were protesting the dems not representing the working class, did so by not voting or voting 3rd party, not by voting for Trump.

            99 percent of those people voted for Trump because of 3 reasons: Racism, Misogyny, or ignorance. There is a fourth group of rich voters who voted for him to line their pockets, but they are a miniscule portion of his votes. This fourth group mostly just invests money to encourage the racist, misogynistic, and ignorant ones to go vote.

          • soupuos@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            By voting for blatant corruption instead? And tax cuts for the rich is not a policy representing the working class.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              They didn’t say that they were making a good decision voting against Dems, just that it was a decision.

              Yes, a bad decision, but that shouldn’t need to be said to anyone with regularly firing neurons.

          • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Ah yes, that’s why they did it. I’m sure that’s exactly why they voted for the, as stated previously, narcissistic etcetera etcetera. Get the fuck out of here.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    At no time in the history of modern politics has the “popular vote” taken precedence over the electoral college. If you’ll remember, biden’s campaign made that point during his defeat of the orange 4 years ago. And the orange complained pretty loudly about it

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      At no time in the history of modern politics has the “popular vote” taken precedence over the electoral college.

      Everybody already knows that. It sill matters. Or would matter, if Harris had gotten more total votes.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not to mention the numbers I saw still show he has more votes than her, he just fell below 50%, add in the people who voted for other candidates or voted for other positions and not president and she is below. I saw only 4% of votes left in California, meaning he will beat her by at least a million votes.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      None of the news you read on this app matters. This is at least an interesting tidbit.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Seriously, how far does that excuse get anyone? “Well everyone didn’t vote for him so whatever” and he says “Yeah they did 🥴” and proceeds to do whatever tf he wants anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s still good to know he doesn’t have one, be able to prove it, and say it a lot all over the place with the receipts in hand.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think this type of thinking is dealing with Trump the wrong way. Censoring him is pointless. He’s going to say what he wants until it isn’t useful and then pivot. He’s going to do what he wants regardless of what he says.

          Don’t take him literally. Take him seriously. Defend at the points of real vulnerability. Counter at the right times. Sow discord and distrust in his hapless helpers and incompetent ranks.

          Play to win.