Buy him out boys

Am a developer, please do not pay for any software subscription if you don’t think it’s worth it.

Us devs would love to give the best experience, but if the customer is willing to pay for a shit experience, guess which path management makes you take.

Hey, we left cause of the enshitification of Reddit itself, toxicity of the users was always part of the package deal.

Nice of him to get all the denial stuff started early so both sides have a nice heads start.

/s

On a serious note though, dems can weapons this

“Trump is a sore loser even before people vote”

But they won’t.

Projection. It’s always projection.

Make America feel hardship again.

Hi! It’s me, the guy you discussed this with the other day! The guy that said Lemmy is full of AI wet blankets.

Omg you found me in another post. I’m not even mad; I do like how passionate you are about things.

Since there isn’t any room for nuance on the Internet, my comment seemed to ruffle feathers. There are definitely some folks out there that act like ALL AI is worthless and LLMs specifically have no value. I provided a list of use cases that I use pretty frequently where it can add value. (Then folks started picking it apart with strawmen).

What you’re talking about is polarization and yeah, it’s a big issue.

This is a good example, I never did any strawman nor disagree with the fact that it can be useful in some shape or form. I was trying to say its value is much much lower than what people claim to be.

But that’s the issue with polarization, me saying there is much less value can be interpreted as absolute zero, and I apologize for contributing to the polarization.

And then people will complain about that saying it’s almost all hype and no substance.

Then that one tech bro will keep insisting that lemmy is being unfair to AI and there are so many good use cases.

No one is denying the 10% use cases, we just don’t think it’s special or needs extra attention since those use cases already had other possible algorithmic solutions.

Tech bros need to realize, even if there are some use cases for AI, there has not been any revolution, stop trying to make it happen and enjoy your new slightly better tool in silence.

I mean, we have no laws about os support.

Imo a very common sense one is to make any software too old to maintain just open source.

Ownership in software should be based on who is willing and capable of maintaining it.

I see some Cerberus in there.

Nah, just force him to sell spaceX.

I wonder if musk envy’s Putin or the other way around, maybe it’s both?

Not until they are the god king.

Capitalism eventually turns into feudalism.

I never understood this, what do the Supreme Court justices have to gain if trump becomes dictator.

Do they really think being more wealthy than now but under a dictator is better?

Like, some of them have children right? Wouldn’t you want your kids to grow up in a democracy if the king your electing can turn on you anytime?

Wealth, these studies find, often stays within rich families across multiple generations.

I was told again and again in my school by my history teacher that generational wealth doesn’t work, and that spoiled kids become poor in a generation or two.

This was related to justifying our economic system.

So… it was always just a lie?

It’s like someone calling you a spice lover

It’s like telling on yourself.

As a software dev, you are my hero!

Well this is a fantastic explanation, thank you!

Yes, we shouldn’t blame all Jews, but I’m a little confused, isn’t the concept of a promise land pretty central to Judaism?

I don’t really like any religion but I think there is a religious “justification” here.

I guess my question is, how is Zionism different than the concept of the promise land?