Summary

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to connect with low-income workers due to a perceived lack of listening, according to AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US.

While union members largely supported Harris, many low-income voters backed Trump, swayed by his messaging on economic insecurity.

Despite Biden’s pro-labor policies, including infrastructure investments, the AFL-CIO now faces challenges under a likely Trump presidency.

AFL-CIO emphasized labor unions’ resilience and commitment to fighting rollbacks while advancing organizing efforts.

With public approval for unions at a near 60-year high, the labor movement plans both defensive and offensive strategies to protect workers.

  • Natanael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    “we have a concrete plan for helping you” - crickets

    “my plans will hurt you but I’m pretending otherwise” - “what a brilliant businessman!”

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      her plan involved helping people get a home loan with no plans to raise the minimum wage

      what did Harris say she was going to bring to table that would attract any voters other than high middle and above class?

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “We have a concrete plan to help you! For example, higher federal minimum wage!”

      "Okay, take my vote!

      Four years later

      “You’ve been in office for four years. Where is the minimum wage hike?”

      “Turns out we can’t actually do it unless we have a supermajority of government. And then it’s still questionable if we will. Vote for us some more in your state and presidency. Hope that others in other states do too. Also stop bitching, we are moral and the other people are fascists, do not fail us, you must defend women and minorities by keeping us in power etc etc.”

      “I had more money under Trump, fuck off.”

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tldr choosing to believe Republicans when they cause problems and blame them on others

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh yeah, definitely, it’s all just Republican propaganda that both of the two parties in a two party system are co-responsible for national and international policy disasters. For sure. Biden definitely wasn’t a lame duck president who decided not even to fight for major proposals he promised and instead squandered political capital to defend Bibi and kill babies. Yup.

            • BMTea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The IRA was a bipartisan effort

              Had Trump been president a similar bill would have been pushed through due to a post-COVID consensus and a concern over falling behind China. Everything else were accomolishments around the margins outweighed by serious damage to public trust, international stability and affordability.

              Biden’s abysmal approval ratings are not a failing of Americans to give him proper credit. That’s the same argument Reoublicans made during the boom economy of 2017-2019.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Did she, though? All I remember is something about a “new small business” subsidy fund, which is… good, I suppose, but didn’t address any of the probkems the average American is facing.

      Okay, there was also the suggestion of Medicare for all, which would put a dent in things, but I only heard it casually mentioned once and it sounded like something she was “open to discussing,” not a core part of her platform.

      Aside from that, there was nothing directly addressing the core daily problems the majority of people are experiencing, like overpriced living expenses and underpaid wages.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The small business loan was a joke if you look at the details. First off most people dont want to start a business its a lot of hard fucking work with a lot of risk. It also had a bunch of means tests involved. Which would make it a disaster to implement and a disaster to get.

        • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Exactly. That’s the “not addressing the actual problems” part. It’s a sounds-good, feels-good, low impact, high visibility token effort. Throw out a little morsel for the general public that doesn’t really help, but critically, doesn’t impact profits for the wealthy class.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I hate to say it, but you have a point. While Kamala had lofty plans to do right by a lot of special interests, she ignored several important ones. What really killed her chances was that, for all of her promises, she had no plan to execute them with what would turn out to be a very hostile Congress.

        That, mixed with the delayed effects of both Trump’s and Biden’s influence, the dogshit-brained blamed Biden for Trump’s bullshit while crediting Trump with Obama’s achievements after Bush. And it’s gonna happen again when all of Biden’s work to improve the economy takes affect during the second of Trump term and everything Trump does wreck the economy so the next president after him will take the blame for it.

        Because most voters in this country, don’t understand that economic policy rarely takes affect in fewer than 2 to 4 years, but the dog shit inside their skull makes them blame whomever is president at the moment, regardless of their actual capability.

        • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because the media they consume have told them it’s the fault of the current president, and they’re too simple to do any thinking for themselves.

          • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            some of us know that the Democrats and Republicans are at fault because it is us that are directly dealing with fallout from both parties

            just wait until the shit that hit the fan finally makes it onto you sitting further out

            and no not all of us had the option to get a backrow seat further away from the fan

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t understand. There is no strategy to pass legislation with a hostile (read GOP) congress. Should she only have campaigned on plans that the GOP agrees on?

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s not the message working people heard. They heard, “we are the establishment whose theories have been fucking you over for fifty years, but in our infinite wisdom and benevolence we have decided to make some changes that WE have determined will make your lives better, and so you must vote for us. After all, we are your intellectual superiors.”

      • Narwhalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. Incredibly theoretical, difficult to understand, highly abstract plans like “raising the national minimum wage”.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Wrong plans, they’re referring to the joke ‘50k small business loan with a bajillion strings attached’, ‘a maybe tax hike for the wealthy, but no transfer to middle/lower income’, ‘here are two tax credits half of which only impact parents and together dont break even on inflation’, ‘absolute refusal to commit to keeping khan’, in short dems to working Americans: fuck you, and here’s some genocide on top. Vote for us because we think we’re the only option.

        • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The theories I’m talking about are neoliberal theories, they are the theories that essentially all economic policies have been based on for the majority of time most of us have been alive. Even if the establishment has recently decided to embrace some changes, you can’t expect people to just forget the last fifty years or so.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes. Incredibly theoretical, difficult to understand, highly abstract plans like “raising the national minimum wage”.

          Gee. Can’t imagine why they didn’t have any fucking credibility on that one.

          Thumbs down, curtsy

        • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They need to find a way to silence the Republicans, then. They need to ensure that people are only getting the right message.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is why Republicans are attacking education, pressuring news companies into only presenting them positively and attacking their opposition (“here’s why Biden’s successes are bad for Biden”), attacking tech companies to pressure them into allowing their disinformation to spread, etc. They’re “playing the refs”.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      “We have a concrete asterisk riddled corporation-friendly plan that I’m talking to you about with Liz Cheney right now for helping… that doesn’t involve anything approaching a green new deal, universal healthcare, or clawing back the massive wealth inequality that continues to worsen and has not improved since the 1970s.

      FTFY…

      But seriously, what is needed has been painfully clear not just for at least the last 4 presidential elections, but for DECADES. MASSIVE changes that are -of course - completely unfeasible (politically) but nonetheless necessary to scream about from the bully pulpit for the chance to make voters believe and push for such changes.

      Trump lies but he PREACHES (granted like it’s some kinda fucked up GOSPEL to his cult of followers)… and this era of “we go high they go low” as if voters care about anything but victories… and “we won’t lie to you with unrealistic promises” as an excuse not to even give aspirational speeches like JFK once used to do with his (at the time) seemingly crazy speeches about having a person walk upon the surface of the moon…

      It just is not a recipe for success. The corporate hacks running the DNC need to be FORCED out, as they don’t actually care that we keep losing. They are in revolving doors that are no different from those of Joe Manchin, Kristen Sinema, or ALL the other Rs.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Supporting unions and a strong FTC and fighting excess prices, versus free-for-all deregulation?

        It wasn’t the policies. It was the insufficient outreach. And of course too many people in leadership not willing to push back, but that’s not the root cause

        • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          All right dude. Ya missed my point. I’m not saying Harris didn’t support anything nor did I say Trump was good or support any of his bullshit. I’m just saying - a campaign where you put Liz fucking Cheney on stage with you during the 100 or so days you had to scramble an attractive message to activate people is fucking stupid centrist corporate DNC bullshit that fucked what initially looked like it could be a winning campaign into the fucking ground.