Dad thought taking the kid to kill a deer was therapy.
Dad thought taking the kid to kill a deer was therapy.
Hear me out, we should go with mega guillotine: https://youtu.be/YYJ5ZViYhHQ
Oregano will go well with the traces of ketamine in the fat tissue.
US’s foreign policy is about as sensible as their gun laws.
In most places it means being a journalist. And Israel did a speed run for the record of journalists killed in war.
I feel the same about the code generation stuff. What I really want is a tool that suggests better variable names.
We have porn games, but we don’t have CP games. There’s a line between violence and SA with minors.
Edit: oh wait, Japan might be an example 🙃 and yeah, they got issues.
The parents are out buying an AR-15 for their son.
On a more serious note, parents always get judged, just not always fairly.
If we’re talking about it from a harm reduction or public health view point then it is the circulation of the content, not the personal generation that poses the greatest risk. Once the material gets circulated, it becomes harder to know it’s origins and it might look like someone IRL and expose them to risks.
Yeah, AIPAC should be illegal to by the same law. Funny how that country gets a free pass.
The law only cares if they were lobbying for a foreign country. If it was China, India or Australia paying the bill, they would still be breaking the law.
The US loved to hire Nazi scientists after the war.
They knew the people paying them worked from a Russian timezone, they actually put it in an email.
Do we assume everything read in a textbook is correct? When we get feedback on drawing, do we accept the feedback as always correct and applicable? We filter and groom data for the AI so it doesn’t need to learn these things.
They were probably talking about white phosphorus: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/lebanon-evidence-of-israels-unlawful-use-of-white-phosphorus-in-southern-lebanon-as-cross-border-hostilities-escalate/
She should work harder and maybe she’ll accomplish as much as Jill Stein has in congress.
I was narrowly taking issue with the comparison to how humans learn, I really don’t care about copyrights.
I can go look at some Monets and paint some shitty water lillies, is that somehow problematic?
If we’re using your paintings as training data for a Monet copy, then it could be.
Are we even talking about AI if we’re saying data quality doesn’t matter?
I don’t understand how when I say “agency” or “an aspect of the process” one would think I’m talking about the volume of information and not the quality.
And here I thought the issue was having a profit driven misinformation machine.