s4e17 “Accession”

  • Wandering_Uncertainty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even if Jellico was right about it being a superior system, he was still being a shit leader.

    You don’t come into a management position and instantly change everything up. You start by learning how things have been going with your staff and setting up a series of changes, with adequate forewarning, for them to adjust to reasonably.

    You sure as hell don’t come into a situation that’s tense with time pressures, emotional pressures, legitimate causes to fear for their lives, etc, and then force a wide array of changes onto your staff.

    Even if the 4-shift thing is unquestionably superior (and let’s assume it is, ignoring the Bajor comments people are making) - it’s still a stupid as fuck thing to do, under the circumstances.

    Especially considering all the other changes and pressures he was adding on, all at the last minute, before a major battle.

    Engine overhaul, protocol changes, shift changes, multi-day extreme overtime, on a staff that’s emotionally distressed right before their lives will be put at severe risk?

    He’s an absolutely terrible captain and a disgrace to Starfleet. His bullshit would have endangered everyone’s lives for no good reason, had he not been damned lucky that the battle never came.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, that’s not how the military works at all. Maybe in business management, but not military. People seem to forget Starfleet is just that. The commander has a philosophy (that they will often draft a letter about when they assume command) and the unit adapts to it. People used to that are a little more understanding of Jellico and recognize that dread the enterprise crew had when they realized how good they had it under Picard.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        People acting like Picard ran a tight ship are just deluding themselves. If Picard ran his ship half as well as, say, a modern air craft carrier then there would be no show. It’d be boring.

        • weker01@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I really wish to see more accurate depictions of military life. Strangely competent in some areas but at the same time mundane incompetence everywhere.

          It would probably be boring though.

              • Infynis@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s basically a workplace comedy, and one of the focuses of the show is how bad Starfleet is about making sure their strange new worlds are getting on okay a couple decades after first contact. The crew of the Cerritos are simultaneously Starfleet’s best, and an absolute embarrassment lol

                It’s a fantastic show, that really gets the soul of Star Trek. You should check it out

          • ashok36@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Stargate and Battlestar Galactica are closer to reality in that sense. BSG in particular.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        not military. People seem to forget Starfleet is just that.

        The Enterprise is a “ship of exploration”, as they remind us every other episode. It has a ton of biological and astronomical labs on board. Their mission is:

        to explore strange new worlds; to seek out new life and new civilizations; to boldly go where no man / one has gone before

        That’s the mission of a diplomatic vessel. They just also have weapons. It’s 100% not a military ship. Starfleet itself is repeatedly described as not a military organization.

        The only “military” version of the Enterprise D is in the TNG episode where they encounter the Enterprise C that returns from the past. It’s completely different from the regular version, and the difference between the timelines is stark.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s 100% not a military ship.

          So why is the Enterprise a critical ship every time there is a major military engagement?

          Starfleet itself is repeatedly described as not a military organization.

          What are the ranks in this “not a military organization” again?

          The episode Jellico is in is called “chain of command”. Weird title for something 100% not military.

          Starfleet’s primary purpose is peace and exploration yes. They still have the structure and organization of a military.

          • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Thank you. Refresh my memory, but wasn’t the whole reason Jellico took over due to Picard being hand picked for a… military special operation?

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            The Enterprise is a “ship of exploration” in a way that’s not possible today. You’re misunderstanding them. They’re like a explorer’s ship in the “Age of Exploration”, Captain Cook or Magellan or Christopher Columbus. Although their mission is slightly different: diplomacy vs. claiming territory.

            All those ships were fast and had weapons too. Diplomacy requires weapons. Starfleet is clearly not a military. Even civilian ships today have “captains”, “first officers”, etc. Cruise ships have them. Even pirate ships had them. Rank and hierarchy is not exclusive to the Navy / military.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              How many Naval battles were the Endeavor, Trinidad, and Santa Maria involved in?

              Starfleet didn’t just send armed ships out exploring like Magellan. The Enterprise was frequently pulled out from exploring/diplomacy and sent into full battles because it was their biggest battleship.

              Sisko was in Starfleet. The Defiant wasn’t for exploration and diplomacy.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Military doesn’t always equate to conquest or violence. For instance, the internet came from a milliary project.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember that DS9 (and the Defiant) operate on a 26-hour day because Bajor has a 26- hour day. That means a three-shift rotation would have people working an extra 40 minutes each day compared to an Earth-normalized ship (almost nine hours a day).

    A four-shift rotation requires everyone to work six and a half hours a day.

    Hell, the idea for a three-shift rotation was probably Starfleet’s idea. And the Bajorans probably went along with it just because they recently got away from pulling 18-hour days!

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    People call Jellico a hardass and yet Riker was pissed at him because he was giving people more time off.

    Jellico was Starfleet’s best captain. I will die on that hill.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I call foul: the Bajoran day (and DS9’s schedule) is based on a 26-hour day, so a 3-to-4-shift rotation would be an easier switch.

    Edit: It makes more sense, anyway. 4 6-hour shifts, with a 30 min meal break each rather than 3 8-hour shifts with a ~50 minute break.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        See my edit, but, yeah.

        It took me decades to realize that, in Chain of Command, Riker was the one in the wrong. Jelico may have been a bit… difficult here and there, but Riker was being an insubordinate child.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Riker came from Alaska and his dad seemed like the 24th century equivalent of a conservative Republican, so maybe he valued the stupid capitalist Protestant work ethic that has no place in a post-scarcity society?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You want some overlap, that way if theres something going on, you can swap easier. And its not a big deal if someone is five minutes late.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      But help me out with the size of the roster. Say you have 25 people needed to operate 25 stations. 3 shifts so you have 75 people on your ship.

      Then you go to 4 shifts without stopping at a start base to pick up extra 25 people. And you have to put 1/3 of your crew in double shifts, or you spread it out so everyone picks up an extra shift 1/3 of the time. And in average everyone works as much as before.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Redundancy is efficiency. No ship would operate with exactly 75 people to cover 25 stations in three shift. Either some of those stations are redundant, or you have more than 75 people. Otherwise, one illness or injury would bring down the whole system.

        A switch to shorter shifts would reduce redundancy on each shift, but each worker would get more rest and be less likely to burnout or get sick, even if they have to pick up occasional double shifts until they can take on more crew.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok kinda makes sense

          Except for O Brian that keeps doing radical sports and injuring his elbow. Or Jadzia and Worfs “training” program every day like rabbits.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I will always defer to the great scholar Weird Al, who once sagely said:

        You should know when

        It’s “less” or it’s “fewer”

        Like people who were

        Never raised in a sewer

        This is from his epic lyrical work, “Word Crimes.”