• Desistance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Written by, sure. But I distinctly remember that the characters cried regularly in that show after trauma.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is what annoys me the most with disco trek.

      These people are supposed to be trained professionals, serving in a military hierarchy and should, before they even graduate, be accustomed to the proper decorum and on duty-appropriate behavior for an officer.

      If they are constantly involved in personal drama and unrelated problems it just feels like watching a therapy session in space. It’s probably exacerbated by the modern season length of a dozen episodes at best, but in the older trek they struck a much more palatable balance of personal issue / character episodes and more plot centric stories.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        At least S1-3 had Michelle Yeoh for when you needed some asses to be kicked.

        I’m on S4 now and honestly struggling to finish it. There’s nobody there I like. Everyone is just so fucking weepy all the time.

        I just finished watching Succession (which I highly recommend), and I think you see somebody cry like three times across the whole show. When it happens it means something. In Discovery it’s like 3 times per episode. It’s exhausting. I don’t know who it’s even written for. I can only imagine this is what 60 year old studio executives think gen Z wants to watch.

      • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think it’s no surprise that each Trek, through its own lens, shows us some vision of a possible future. ST:D just showed us a future where living life means dealing with the whole mind and not treating it like a taboo. Considering all the recent buzz about not neglecting mental health, I think ST:D was really relevant in its time for exploring what could be different in a better future. It’s not a documentary, it’s a vision.

          • GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Especially because it’s not a naming convention used for any other show: we don’t call Voyager ST:V, or Prodigy ST:P. The logical abbreviation is either DIS or DSC

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I keep rooting for DISCO. One, because it’s on their exercise uniform, and two, because disco’s not dead, baby!

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        it just feels like watching a therapy session in space.

        TNG had the ship’s therapist literally sitting next to the captain.

    • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Can we just take this to its natural conclusion and have the entitled hippy arts majors come up with their interpretation of ww1 trench warfare? I took a lot of theater in school for fun (not allowed to double major) and saw all kinds of dumb takes but nothing on this level, I have no idea what bubble they’re finding these writers in.

      • Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The lead writer/producer for Discovery is also the same writer/producer of the last half of Voyager and parts of DS9. I swear, Paramount is the biggest reason you dislike so much of Discovery, not the actors/writers/producers.