• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you’re a genocideologist everything looks like genocide.

    It’s inherent to his genocideology

    • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does studying the occurrences and causes of genocide make you unable to correctly identify them? I would think it to be the opposite, them being able to better identify and understand current genocides or events and actions that might lead to one.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Genocide is a rather simple word. It’s a contraction of geno (race) with cide (murder/killing). Anyone telling you they’ve needed to study the meaning of the word for more than 2 minutes is either a moron or a liar

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have spent more then 2 minutes discussing genocide here with us today, have you not used more then 2 minutes of thought in all your posts?

          Writing a book on genocide would take more then 2 minutes. Writing a catalog of all known genocides would take more then 2 minutes. Writing up the definition of genocide would take more then 2 minutes, getting two people to agree on a definition would take FOREVER. Getting 152 countries to agree on the definition of genocide would take years…

          Taking a complex issue, and being reductive to the point of absurdity isn’t being helpful.