I’m honestly surprised Republicans are doing this unless it’s extremely targeted.

Increasing voter turnout generally works against them.

11% went for Johnson

In 2016 the kids favored Clinton by 17 points (36% Trump to 53% Clinton)

they never shut the fuck up

Just wait til the day after the election thru the following 3.5 years

Trump, who frequently touts his rally crowd sizes and has claimed without evidence that Harris uses artificial intelligence to boost her crowd numbers, was also in Texas on Friday. He reportedly spoke to a far more modest crowd of around 100 supporters in Austin before recording a podcast interview with Joe Rogan.

Alternate (More accurate) Headline:
Washington Post editorial writers’ endorsement of Kamala Harris stopped by CEO

“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

The Washington Post’s editorial writers had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for president, according to four people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive newsroom matters.

Shallow playbook.

You go to war with the army you have…

I just hope he doesn’t manage to run out the clock before facing consequences.

I wouldn’t bet on it, but I do hope for it.

Lincoln Project founder Rick Wilson: “Kamala came to Fox to stack bodies.”

😂

…and on a more serious note:

Former New York Congressman Max Rose called it “a home run, because she sent the one message that needs to be sent, which was, ‘I will go anywhere at any time and show the courage necessary to speak to every American,’ because that’s what a real president does. The primary critique against her prior to this point was that she was not doing enough interviews. No one thought that the Fox News interview was going to go swimmingly every step of the way. Everyone knew it would be adversarial, but she showed exactly what she needed to show, which was that she is a leader, ready to be president on Day One.”

I could only find MSN aggregation of third rate sources (Times Now, The Spun, and Daily Beast).

Do you have a link?

No shit. I did find some reports confirming that, but none I trust enough to share.

These people have put political signs everywhere around here that say “Vote Cupcakes” or “Vote Cookies for president”

They think it’s all a joke

That’s the one group I don’t understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump?

Tax cuts for the rich

Provisional ballots can be held back until a voter’s eligibility is verified but once a ballot is put into the general pool there is no way.

And that’s separate from not being able to count a ballot that was incorrectly filled. Those ballots are not tied to a specific voter.

I’m happy with my Fellow Ode 2. The ionizer is a game changer. If I wanted something that could do espresso too I’d probably start looking at the Opus.

I might look at the 1zpresso J-Ultra, but I’m not sure how well it handles filter coffee.

I could do it, but not since the stairs are out of TP

I am looking at the numbers. Your graphic says the same thing the article does. That’s why I was asking for clarification

How does this address the swing with a single datapoint?

…or $44 billion for Twitter…

I mean It’s just Cheerios in tomato juice
¯\_(ツ)_/¯