• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like… an endorsement from Dick Cheney isn’t getting you independents. They hate those war criminals also.

    I think you are vastly overestimating how many of these independents are progressive. I think many more of them are just too busy to care until it affects them personally. They are not as hung up on the casual war crime or two as you are, as long as they are not the ones in the receiving end of it.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think you are vastly overestimating how many of these independents are progressive.

      That’s an interesting and telling assumption you make. You should probably address the assertion on its merits instead of projecting what you think my reasoning is, because I do have one, and its not the one you are making up.

      Do you think that Dick Cheney’s endorsement gets Democrats independents?

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Let’s put it this way. How many Independants, who were leaning toward voting for Harris already, see the Dick Cheney endorsement and say “That’s it! That’s the last straw, I’m not voting for her!” I think you can count those people on one hand (or maybe no hands). I think that group is exclusively people who would have never voted for Harris because even she is too far right for them, and are using Cheney as an excuse.

        OTOH, I think many more Independants categorize themselves that way because they are fed up with partisanship entirely, and would be pulled toward the side that appears to have the bigger tent. Maybe Cheney himself isn’t the tipping point. But his endorsement, plus all the Republicans who refuse to endorse Trump, might be.