• OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re getting down voted, but you’re right. The actual lawmakers are probably more racially motivated. But based on my experience growing up in Alabama, most of the regular “pro-life” voters seem motivated by a genuine belief that abortion is murder.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Until they need an abortion. Then they’re fine with it. Ask anyone who works at an abortion clinic how many times people out there protesting come in for abortions

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes because they don’t actually believe that they are killing a living human. That’s why they will get it done for themselves or their mistresses.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I could see the race thing being more true for the politicians but even then I think it’s less of a thing than most people on Lemmy think.

      If we stop to think about it a moment I think that becomes clear.

      Do we think Ted Cruz would rather have a black Republican neighbor or a white Democrat? I truly think he’d rather have a black Republican neighbor. I believe the same is true for everyone I grew up with in Texas.

      IF we accept that (big if, admittedly) it can’t be a race thing. It would have to extend to a cultural thing.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you from an area that mainly espouses colorblindness as its racism?

        A month ago, I was sent a picture of a black lynching by a Nazi. It’s 100% about race for a lot of people.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Note that I didn’t say racism didn’t exist anymore. I said it wasn’t the driving principle behind their position on abortion. And that hyper fixation on race does a disservice to them and others by often missing the point.

          I would also say “color blindness” isn’t racism, if that’s what you meant. Maybe I misunderstood you?

          I largely agree with Coleman Hughes on this point but I frankly don’t expect anyone here to honestly engage with his position.

          • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well, I’ve already explained exactly why it’s a continuation of native American genocide and how race is 100% a driver for these organizations en masse, even though other races are also affected.

            It’s not a hyperfixation on race to acknowledge racial issues and address them.

            I guessed you were from an area with colorblindness as it’s main racism, I am as well. That’s because you’re in an area that is still colonizing land from Natives, so it’s important to reduce their claims. One way to do this is to erase their heritage and ethnicity by forcing language, names, holidays, foods, etc that aren’t part of their history. Suppressing claims of racism automatically is colorblindness and part of how colorblindness is racist.

            https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Native-Indian-Culture-Color-Blind-Racism-F3YRAC73VU5YW

            Another form of racism placed onto Native Indian people is color-blind racism. This form of racism rationalizes “racial inequality as the outcome of nonracial dynamics” (Robertson 120). Color-blind racism takes the standards created by the dominant discourse and applies them to all ethnic groups, putting them on an even level plain field without recognizing historical or social context of each group. Therefore, according to color blind racism, the effects of casualties and stereotypical of Native Indians such as alcoholism, poverty, etc. is essentially their fault and they should be the ones to start change. However, these the casualties of Native Indian culture was changed by racial oppression implemented by the dominant discourse. Therefore, Native Indians cannot be the ones to change of societal perception when they were not the ones to implement it.

            https://www.pbs.org/education/blog/unlearning-kindness-color-blindness-and-racism

            The pressure to assimilate and narrow the gaps in our proximity to Whiteness goes hand and hand with so-called “color blindness,” or claiming not to see race. At best, this ideology is misguided because it’s predicated on the false assumption that if we do not talk about or acknowledge race and racism, then these issues will go away. It should go without saying that this is asinine, yet so many well-meaning White people wear their alleged color blindness as a badge of honor.

            At worst, it is a White supremacist tool used to intentionally gaslight BIPOC and give White people a justification for turning away from the experiences and voices of BIPOC. Color blindness requires BIPOC to “grin and bear” everyday instances of racism. We are expected to do this all in the name of making White people more comfortable with benefitting from their ancestors’ ill-gotten gains, as well as current inequalities. This is the “polite” brand of racism that prioritizes White supremacist notions of decorum, comfort, and acceptable forms of social expression over dismantling racism and alleviating the suffering that it causes.