No.

Reimplement the old WASTE client from the Nullsoft dude, this time with proper encryption and security and let’s call it a day.

Showing bias by claiming its an effort to not show bias is fucking insanity.

Don Cheadle already remade it and it was perfection.

JDPC Vance.

That’s the exact argument against voting for Green party candidates.

Nobody is entitled to any votes.

We wouldn’t vote for either of your shitty Putin compromised candidates even if they were they were the only ones on the ballot.

China and Northern Mongolia?

You missed the real joke.

“So Twitter.” is a way of saying “Fuck Elon, stil gonna call it Twitter.” ;)

Lol, somebody tried to report this as “ChatGPT”

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-sentence/

For-Profit Medical Corporations would miss out on some lowest effort, unethical, low margins for their extreme profiteering opportunities?

There is a reasonable amount of time that could be considered with post history as demonstrating you aren’t a bot, but 16 days just ain’t it. You made the claim about your post history as evidence, I responded to YOUR claim based on a whopping 16 days worth of comments.

You are still fully disconnected from reality and reason. Your arrogance seems to drive your ego.

I didn’t look up your profile, my mobile app automatically puts a tag next to a username on any new user with the number of days the account has existed. You’re not that important or interesting.

I’ve never voted out of fear and never will. It’s an easy choice to not vote for Jill Stein when I don’t let cognitive dissonance blind me to her Putin associations. My strategy is always to vote in favor of People rather than Politics.

You have a 16 day old account created in the midst of an election season filled with propaganda bots.

Your posting history is simply not valid evidence. Your logic sure seems disconnected from reality.

I like how we’ve completely erased Vista from our collective memories at this point.

You didn’t challenge the statement at all, all you did was make a sarcastic quip to mock it without any substantive reasoning, then followed up with dismissiveness when pushed back on.

Your mocking statements do not have any right to go unchallenged.

It’s a two way street based on your own logic tree. Let’s stop wasting time with contextual meta nonsense.

Weird, thats not all I was doing, but go head, pile on.

Believe it or not, mocking people out of the gate with no context can be construed as being an asshole bully.

I’m fully open to the idea that its not a conspiracy at all, but you’re too interested in a chance to mock ideas rather than ask or explore anything that diverts from your apparent need to punch down.

This is a common theme for you and has been for a long time on here, one minute you seem to see yourself as a victim of bullies and even come to others defense, but the next minute you are attacking those you assume are outside of your bubble of belief while pretending sarcastic mocking excuses blithe arrogance.

This isnt Reddit, why continue to bring that sort of vitriol here?

Obviously not, is there a reason you feel it necessary to mock my arbitrary comments on this other than just being a jackass bully?

The yacht seemingly sank because of the storm, but we don’t have enough confirmed evidence to make that a factual consideration yet, just a guess. There are a lot of pieces that may connect. The missing people include very high wealth individuals, and the lawsuit angle creates a connection for potential malfeasance.

What better cover story would work to hide several crimes? Its not necessarily a conspiracy of crime, but it has some weird timing.