• sic_1@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          As far as I know those services are barely breaking even, using the few remaining old sleeper wagons. Growth of them is not likely because new wagons cost a lot and profitability is low.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just put less rows of seats and have them properly recline. Some people will want small rooms, but cheap sleeper seats help as well. People sleep in planes too.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I want to say that sleep is terrible because blood flow isn’t as good as when lying down.

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          There is a reason pressure socks are sometimes recommended on very long flights even for people with no prior heart issues :)

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The quality of sleep you get in a reclining seat will be well below that of a fully horizontal sleeper bunk. Unless it’s one of those first-class airline pod seats which reclines all the way, though those take up more space than compartments of sleeper bunks, and only exist because of aviation safety requirements which don’t apply on railways.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah good point. In the transsiberia express they have 1st class, 2 person compartments with beds and also 4 person compartments with bunkbeds as 2nd class and 3rd class is an open wagon filled with 3 story bunkbeds.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or a better night train. The slowness is not an issue if you can actually save time by merging the trip and the hotel stay.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re essentially paying for a hotel that transports you to a different city by next morning, as if by magic. You can have a full day’s work or sightseeing, eat dinner, board your train and get a reasonable night’s sleep, waking up to have another full day at your destination.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your room is smaller, more like a prison cell than a hotel room. And it’s noisier (depending on the train). And there’s no guarantee you will arrive on time. And the food is worse. And you can’t leave.

          It’s like being in prison. I want to like trains but they need to be fast (high speed rail) or convenient (subways).