President Joe Biden announced Thursday $3 billion toward identifying and replacing the nation’s unsafe lead pipes, a long-sought move to improve public health and clean drinking water that will be paid for by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Biden unveiled the new funding in North Carolina, a battleground state Democrats have lost to Donald Trump in the past two presidential elections but are feeling more bullish toward due to an abortion measure on the state’s ballot this November.

The Environmental Protection Agency will invest $3 billion in the lead pipe effort annually through 2026, Administrator Michael Regan told reporters. He said that nearly 50% of the funding will go to disadvantaged communities – and a fact sheet from the Biden administration noted that “lead exposure disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income families.”

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am not sure if you’ve seen the process through which public funding gets funneled through private companies to implement.

    The decision to delegate the task to break one job apart for portions of the same job is a thing. My hometown had separate teams building a highway: one westbound one eastbound. They build things in the wrong place.

    https://archive.kitsapsun.com/news/local/890000-mistake-discovered-on-highway-16-project-ep-419650199-357597121.html

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am aware of the process. I’m not sure what that has to do with “sometimes a big project takes a lot of work, and other things also have to happen to do it”.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        A lot of projects get a lot bigger and become a lot more work without doing much or other things.

        Like a local decision to build a new police station, including shooting range requiring land clearing, versus utilizing that funding for the addressing the homeless population. It wasn’t what the money was originally for, but it got moved around legally enough.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I read your article and it pretty clearly says that the problem was with the State DOT Planners and Engineers, not the construction teams.

      The problem in this case wasn’t with the people building the road it was with the people who planned it. AKA The Government.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, yes. The planners and engineers are the ones subject to all the political hands of local governments.

        Certainly not implicating the construction teams themselves. (Though arguably still if one firm were building both sides they may have noticed sooner.)

        Now I admit I say this from both personal experience and a tinge of disgruntlement. But my remarks regard government serving private interests over public ones, not government itself. The system that these planners operate under is one rife with regulatory capture.

        Point is: there’s going to be significant administrative bleed at best.