President Joe Biden had conspiracy theorists in a tizzy after posting what appeared to be his reaction to the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl win on Sunday night.

“Just like we drew it up,” Biden posted on X alongside a photo of “Dark Brandon,” the meme created by hardcore—and very online—supporters of Donald Trump that Biden and his team loved so much they adopted it as their own.

The post was apparently referencing far-right conspiracy theories which posit the NFL and high-level government operatives conspired to rig the Super Bowl in Kansas City’s favor to give maximum exposure to a yet-to-be-announced endorsement from Chiefs star Travis Kelce and his girlfriend Taylor Swift.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 months ago

    Am USer. I have no explanation, but I can assure you that being up close to this shit doesn’t help it make any more sense. I come from a conservative white family in a mostly white area, and sure I can see how people get into that insular world and are conditioned to reject rational inquiry, but at the same time we live in the information age, people!

    • Shanedino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is that there is too much information. And information doesn’t come with a disclaimer of whether it’s fact, opinion, conspiracy, or otherwise batshit.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Or went back to it? I think there was only a short period of time in human’s existence when only the intellectual elite could reach the public with the new technologies because it was too complicated or pricey for the common people. Now we’re back to bar-room level of information quality.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Or went back to it?

            Now we’re back to bar-room level of information quality.

            /disagree

            There used to be something called The Fourth Estate (of Government). Used to be.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Was that press accessible for the average people at that time? Everybody being able to read is fairly recent too.

      • RedFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Did people think more critically before? Or maybe there was limited dissemination in the past? Crazy BS maybe didn’t travel as far?

        I’d like to think we could differentiate between fact, opinion, and BS more in the past, but that’s probably not true.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think learning everything about the world from the random unqualified people around you is exactly how most people in history have done it. As long as it’s a person you like and they say it with confidence, it will probably stick.

          But now it is easier to see that process happening and avoid it. It’s also easier to locate authoritative sources of information.

          Except… even though this works for many of us, it paradoxically makes the problem WORSE for a huge number of people. We have easier access to all the opinions out there, but that means any given shitty opinion has the potential to reach millions rather than somebody’s social circle.

          • RedFox@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I agree. What I have no idea about these days is how to solve this.

            It might be a ‘there is no solution’ type problem, but it would be nice if more people and organizations as a whole recognized this issue.

            Maybe publishing questionable information over a long period of time or our lack of holding orgs and individuals accountable contributed. I’d think it hard to legislate accountability without reducing freedom or speech, press, and opinion (that isn’t toxic, but that’s subjective and part of the problem isn’t it).