• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, that’s a false dichotomy, there are other choices. Such as “help disadvantaged people regardless of their genetics.” I reject the “but it’s too hard” argument. If racial discrimination or gender discrimination or discrimination based on orientation is wrong, then it’s wrong. Don’t put an asterisk on it with a list of types that it’s okay for.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I already did that in the comment you’re responding to:

        Such as “help disadvantaged people regardless of their genetics.”

        Or two comments previous to this one:

        Why not just “disadvantaged people”? That takes race out of the equation entirely, and everyone is satisfied.

        How often do you need it repeated?