• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the states would have to agree to it first, wouldn’t they? Congress can’t unilaterally modify the Constitution (thank Christ).

    • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I think there needs to be a senate & congress vote AND a majority of states need to ratify the amendment after which the Supreme court does a review.

      Elon Musk and Donald Trump are so out of touch with the basic American citizen today that I’m sure they think the Postal Service is the organization that puts up road signs and highway barriers or something

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think there needs to be a senate & congress vote AND a majority of states need to ratify the amendment after which the Supreme court does a review.

        I’m not sure a Supreme Court review is an official part of the process—the SC can review the constitutionality of ordinary laws, but amendments are constitutional by definition.

        • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Wouldn’t the Supreme Court need to review to make sure 1 new amendment doesn’t include wording that conflicts with other amendments thought? Just asking, not sure about any of these, in fact I cannot even remember any amendment ratified after the Women’s right to vote in the 1920s.

          • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            No, by definition a Constitutional Amendment would be part of the Constitution. All branches of government derive their authority from the Constitution. Simply put, the Constitution is above SCOTUS.

            The Supreme Court can intercede if the process for ratification is not followed, but as long as the agreed upon process is followed there is literally nothing a judge could do.