And national service unless you leave the country long enough to age out.

…and people worry about the name of a git branch.

Right. It’s the “People’s car”. The strategy was in the name.

…with our expensive EVs…

They can’t compete on price primarily.

There is no genocide untill every last one of them is dead.

/s

I don’t view free-use models as open-source. Open-source means I can rebuild it from scratch and I can’t because I don’t know what the training data is, or have access to it.

The scale is the difference and who is harmed.

Billion dollar company losing $100. Who cares?!

Billion dollar company stealing from all artists in the world. We care.

Points 2 and 3. Basically make restrictions on normal user accounts which are fine for humans but that will make bots swear and curse.

Unless you mean “what should the registration process be” I think API keys via a user account would do.

…but if they don’t know I expect them to say so. An LLM isn’t trustworthy until it says “I don’t know”.

Exactly the reason I suggest it.

I believe the electric funaces are called "Arc furnaces" and you heat by making electricy jump between conductors.

One of the advantages over blust furnaces is that production can be varied more easily as there isn’t a whole lot of ancillary parts of the furnance which all need to get up to temperature. So only running them on excess energy might be more practical.

An LLMs “intent” is always to give you a plausible response even if it doesn’t have the “knowledge”. The same behaviour in a human would be classed as lying IMHO.

1. Make bot accounts a separate type of account so legitimate bots don’t appear as users. These can’t vote, are filtered out of post counts and users can be presented with more filtering option for them. Bot accounts are clearly marked.

2. Heavily rate limit any API that enables posting to a normal user account.

3. Make having a bot on a human user account bannable offence and enforce it strongly.

Agreed, It wouldn’t be a good thing. However it’s their own failures and mismanagement that are causing it.

Well we had to vote in a whole new government and then wait for them to get back from holiday.

It’s certainly arguable that the algorithm constitutes an editorial process and so that opens them up to libel laws and to liability.

Fair point.

Stupid sharks loose their teeth, not their fins that actually do the work.

Errr…wat!!!

The shark dies either way.

Under what law?

UK currently holds the people that post things liable for their own words. X, the platform, just relays what is said. Same as Lemmy. Same as Mastodon.

If you ban X I don’t see why those other platforms wouldn’t be next.

Now should people/organisations/companies leave X? Absolutely! Evacuate like it’s a house of fire. Should it be shut down by legal means? No.

From a exterior perspective China is not it’s people. It’s people are silenced. China’s words and actions are only those of the leadership. It would be wonderful if we heard the voice of the people when dealing with China. Sadly we have to deal with their subjugators.

Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.

Your XOrg conf ig has got hard definitions of your devices which aren’t matching what is being detected. Probably best to let auto detection do it’s thing.