Somewhere at Microsoft there is, presumably a Teams Team team.

Ftfy

You haven’t seen Britain since 1490?

Lost?

Very true. I’m not saying it’s something that would be soon. These are discussions that should be now, to help determine morally where we as societies want to go with the new technology.

While this is fabulous news I do worry that there could be similar done for other genetic conditions that are far more contentious as to whether they’re a disability not.

Neurodivergence is the one that springs to mind right away. The majority of people on the autism spectrum are at level 1. While it has negatives there are positives into thinking and seeing the world differently.

How many of those would have been ‘curered’ in the womb by scared parents who’ve just been told that their child will be born autistic? Scared parents who’s fear will mean when hearing that they think of someone at the far end of level 3.

Then what about for ADHD and dyslexia.

What about other physical conditions like dwarfism etc.

Pretty sure that’s the point they’re trying to make.

You could just do that first

Yes. When it’s intrusive

Shitty Picard season 2 we want to do mirror universe but not.

Which is why they’re looking to add a easy to reed short overview.

some article summaries can be quite dense and filled with technical jargon, but that Al features needed to be cleared labeled as such and that users needed an easy to way to flag issues with "machine-generated/remixed content once it was published or generated automatically.

I feel like if they feel that this is an issue generate the summary in the talk page and have the editors refine and approve it before publishing. Alternatively set an expectation that the article summaries are in plain English.

Batter looks a bit flabby and chips not great.

The decider though is whether it’s cod or haddock (as depending on where in England one or the other will be an instant no).

What’s going on with the weather mate? Fuckin needs to make up its mind init, yesterday in shorts today jumper.

When you ask a British guy his salary, but a cultural stigma surrounding talking openly about money makes him too uncomfortabe to answer and he changes the subject.

All right, then. Keep your secrets.

But your headlights are still bright enough to melt everyone else’s retinas

Just a giant candle, no?

Gotta be about third after humans and mosquitoes.

Oh I see. Yes, maybe they’ve realised that getting seen like that isn’t helping, especially as they’ve been doing a lot to do with workers rights which clearly is going unnoticed if you think their “whole deal” has been cutting essential services and austerity. (though I’d argue that it’s not essential for people like my dad who’s on a final salary pension of about £35k plus his state pension to receive winter fuel allowance)

Absolutely this.

Themes water should have been allowed to go bust so the government could buy it back super cheap.

I’m glad at least it looks like the threat of them forcing them not to take bonuses will be making them voluntarily not take them. Plus the whole personal liability for pollution thing so that the execs can end up with prison time if they don’t get their act together.

I’m lost now. Labour are economically left of centre (though arguably have been drifting more right) they’re all for nationalisation. It’s the conservatives (right of centre though moving further right recently and just a bit unhinged lately) that want everything privatised.