So you’d need an account in all of these networks?

And how would cross-posting work?

There are GPU-locked apps?

Wtf

AT does have some advantages, but I strongly prefer the whole philosophy behind AP.

And yes, bsky doesn’t really inspire me with confidence.

Neither is good

Nice

Good to see one of the two big packaging hubs do something against malware

Manjaro GNOME Edition,
But am now on NixOS 😸❄️🐈✨

Ain’t no one getting excited about any kind of capitalism any more 🤮🤢

Yes, basically agree.

But I just think it’s kind of obvious why they only block one ethnicity, I believe protecting consumers was only the second priority here.

It simply makes no sense that it only blocks Chinese citizens specifically.

I don’t want anyone to buy/own housing which goes uninhabited for a long time while there are so many homeless people who need a place to call home.

It’s difficult to imagine a person struggling to buy/rent an apartment/house, and for them to get mad about nationalities, rather than the fact that housing needs to be an “investment opportunity” over being recognized as the basic human need that it really is.

I hardly care if it’s Chinese people, Wallstreet, some Big Tech corporation, or just individual landlords driving up prices.

Housing must be accessible to all people, if a society wants to call itself civilized.

This bill going against Chinese citizens, rather than all foreigners tells you all you need to know about the real motivations behind it.

Could’ve worked on tackling climate change, inflation, homelessness, (some form of) European style health care, labour rights, or expand public transit, but they choose to discriminate against transgender people for zero gain.

Why are the United States so wird?

And how do you even enforce such a law effectively?
Many people have very good passing, and there have already been (self video-) recorded cases of cisgender people getting “accused” of being trans by some transphobe.

No one even wants these laws, at least most people don’t.

And why is the headline so non-judgemental? “Regulates” isn’t a good fit for tyranny imo.

Just because these people can’t vote yet doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have rights or be treated with dignity and respect like the rest of society.

I’m disappointed with people arguing that literally banning smartphones would somehow improve the social situation for anyone.

Just because you cannot see bullying or collect statistics about it quite as easily, does not mean it disappears. I’d argue the opposite: blocking others online is trivial compared to doing the same in-person.

We also have to acknowledge that some children simply are more introverted, and will want to stay more secluded than others. Forcing them to behave in other ways seems counterproductive.

Just because some parents (understandably) struggle with raising their kids shouldn’t mean that they’re all doomed to what amounts to nationwide collective punishment.

I for one support children’s rights, at least on this one point.

Edit:
Exact circumstances can, and will very, as every child is unique. Therefore, we should allow for case by case decisions. Luckily, the de facto situation already has the parents deciding, which makes sense in most cases IMO.

And taking away the phones of other people won’t stop online bullying either (e.g. spreading rumors without the victim’s knowledge).

Removing /repo is not considered safe, but I just removed its contents anyways and then just ran a repair.

That actually resulted in more available disk space than after running the garbage collection.

And my flatpak apps still work 🤷‍♀️

It’s the last page is the PDF: https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2023-12/FY22 CID Project Summaries-Map-r1.pdf

In case they use some kind of hotlink protection, here’s the link to the main website: https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fy22-CID-program-selections

Can we please not destroy the Cmmission?

The European Commission stands or falls by is ability to act independently. Having it’s leadership (and lower layers) messed with from without, it may be significantly more prone to corruption and undermines it’s effectiveness to help the average citizen like it has done impressively for the last decades until now.

Landmark legislations such as the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, and the GDPR, among many others, would perhaps not have been feasible to realize like they have been, if the European Commission couldn’t have the best commissioners for the jobs.

While I do agree with many points made in this proposed legislation, I can only hope the damage done to the European Commission stays as small as anyhow possible.