- Sometimes you’re getting it from all sides and all you can really do is sigh and let it happen.
I don’t speak French, but I did translate “cat, I farted” into French on Google Translate and had it dictate the result. It sounds a good deal like ChatGPT, especially if you’re primed to listen for it.
EDIT: Or at least it used to. Now, if you translate “cat, I farted” it gives you “Cat, j’ai pété” and pronounces the C as a hard C, like it reads. Maybe it’s deciding that “cat” on its own is the name “Cat,” and thus not in need of translation. If you give it different context you get the expected result, as with translating “I had to tell the cat, I farted” you get back “J’ai dû dire au chat, j’ai pété,” which when pronounced the last bit sounds as expected.
They subscribe to the theory that less forward acceleration is the same thing as slowing down.
Just write a script that runs periodically to check the log’s size and delete when its near the crash threahold.
Describing a soul is task for a philosopher. I merely recognize a familiar spark.
You go, Kim Coco Iwamoto!
The Outer Worlds is like if you stripped half the soul and the content out of New Vegas, slapped a coat of paint on it and threw a brick on the accelerator.
The baby bear pelt circumstance robbed from him years ago?
I’d be careful asking people if they’re stupid and speculating that they’re clueless when you are apparently unwilling to producing a link to the data you quote.
Standardized interchangeable batteries would be neat. Pull into a battery station, a machine swaps out your packs and you’re on your way faster than a fill-up.
IIRC they’re replacing damaged chips.
But how worth living is a life overly guarded?
Others are bad at risk assessment by over estimating risk. They are boring buzzkills.
You’re so close, now just give me a link to the data that you are citing.
And then it will still be an annoying, stupid way to advertise.
Bruh I just want you to supply the data you claim to be citing. It’s super easy and standard practice. It is not my job to research the point I think you are making.
Or, you could simply say you don’t have data to back up what you said. Either works and neither is as embarrassing as coming back to this well over and over while entirely missing that I just want to see your data.
Hey, look who it is, the person who keeps replying without linking the mountains of data they’re referencing.
They can keep the problem from starting, but any processors that are already impacted need to be RMA’d
So you keep saying.
Taking over the news cycle following the RNC while invalidating some of the rhetoric from it.
Dumping the stock as soon as possible was always the plan, this is just money laundering through an acquisition company.