The New York Times downplayed his racist, sexist and violent rhetoric and doing “both sides” shit for the last 8 years (the best word I have heard to describe this is “sanewashing”)… and now they are coming out with this?
Fuck the New York Times.
I laughed when I read this and then I sobered up when I realised it’s not an exaggeration.
He could literally piss on them and they would cop it with a grin.
CANCEL CULTURE
Fair enough. Didn’t realise there were so many Arab voters.
I agree. It is about money.
AIPAC is very well funded and powerful.
It’s pretty simple.
There is an election in November and noone wants to anger the power AIPAC lobby or Jewish voters.
The political press corps understands that Trump coverage generates great ad revenue, so they are willing to compromise their principles on this matter.
Nativism is unfortunately a consistent undercurrent.
Look up the “Know Nothing” movement.
If you have wondered how some people deny obviously documented things like the Holocaust, this is a prime example.
Most “AI” I have seen are basically fancy iterations of autocomplete.
“The starvation and mass killing of civilians in the Warsaw Ghetto is a legitimate strategy” - This guy.
In America, it is.
Or those who believe it.
Like really, it is mostly bullshit.
Is there a link for this?
If you are not paying then you are the product.
Totally out of the loop on this one.
I agree but they are not as influential as AIPAC regarding supporting the mass punishment and murder of civilians in the middle east.
Weapons manufacturers will be busy for years resupplying stocks that were provided to Ukraine.
They have spent $100 million dollars this cycle.
Any politician that stands up to AIPAC gets millions (if not tens of millions) raised for their political opponents.
The vast majority of politicians are far too frightened to anger this lobby in an election year.
Because he is a white conservative.