I’ve read, oh, a dozen ‘pretty simple’ explanations that claimed to explain what has happened. All of them had merits.
I don’t believe things are ‘pretty simple’ anymore.
I’ve read, oh, a dozen ‘pretty simple’ explanations that claimed to explain what has happened. All of them had merits.
I don’t believe things are ‘pretty simple’ anymore.
This may just be an observation from across the pond, but it feels like the But Gaza people were nothing but a troll farm and y’all got played.
Man, this whole situation is all kinds of fucked.
You guys need a labor party
What’s the tornado’s vector, Victor?
No. I will not live in a Shadowrun campaign without the dragons and orcs to keep me company. Just no.
CNN feigns ignorance of the Overton window. They give a platform to viewpoints that are specifically designed to stir controversy, and in the process, they move the window to the right, bit by bit, all in the service of the almighty dollar.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
So I watched the raw video. Him trying to make smalltalk with the staff only to be rewarded with deafening silence every time he veered into anything political… That was music to my ears. Same with the denigrations against the press and Kamala.
On the other hand, the words ‘crowd size’ and ‘never touched by human hand’ have lost all meaning to me now.
How much is that in Libraries of Congress?
Thanks for providing a direct link to the documents, OP. Much appreciated :)
Are we still doing phrasing? Also, where’s Maury when you need him?
A UK rag riffing on relations between the US and EU. There’s nothing for the EU to panic at.
This is just rage bait; ignore.
☝️ I’ll have what he’s having
deleted by creator
Man, I miss r/vxjunkies
Yeah, I saw that report, it was absolutely ludicrous. But that just makes me wonder even more. Why destroy a thing when you’ve spent millions of (buckets of) rubles and years to build it in the first place? Just because Ukraine could destroy it someday? Why not just… not visit anymore? I really don’t get it.
I don’t get it. Why? What is the point?
Awesome, so, essentially, you create a name.pod file like so: […]and join every container into the pod through the following line in the .container files
Yep, that’s the way!
and I presume this all gets started via systemctl --user start name.service and systemd/podman figures out somehow which containers will have to be created and joined into the pod, or do they all have to be started individually?
Systemd figures it out iff you have specified your service dependencies correctly, with things like After=
, Upholds=
, BindsTo=
, etc. Have a look at systemd.unit
manpage for details. For my paperless service, it goes something like this:
systemctl --user start paperless
, which depends on:
The point of quadlet was to lean as heavily as possible on systemd for the service and dependency bits and use podman only for translating the container bits into something systemd can handle. The one bit of dependency handling that quadlet does is to make sure that paperless.pod
is started before all containers that have Pod=paperless.pod
in their quadlet file.
Either way, I find the documentation of this feature lacking. When I tested this stuff myself, I’ll look into improving it.
That would be amazing, of course! :) I find that, if you’re familiar with unit files, you’re like 85% of the way there already. By the way, the unit files that quadlet generates are somewhere in $XDG_RUNTUME_DIR
for you to inspect. I’m afraid I’m not at a computer right now andI don’t know the exact path off the top of my head.
Nah, I have a paperless pod created with Quadlet.
In the words of Wash: Oh god, oh god, we’re all gonna die.