Wu TANG ✊🏼

Hung. Methane claims were full of shit? Anyone get a bingo?

So, you simply mean “being preached at”? What’s the over/under on religious “leaders” feeling they’re above the law, etc., but knowing that they have to keep the sheep from spooking?

That’s generous. Statistically speaking, fewer can read than will.

Their book says…

NGL, The Flash is only wtf until he realizes he’s next to godly in power. IMHO, supes’re best consumed when they’re post-humanist.

Hack the planet!

🎵 "I like big bass, I can’t deny*🎶

What a lukewarm compliment. I need to wash my hands now, ew.

TBF, even three “generations” in that span assumes parenthood by 28 (2021: 30, FYI), and 4+ generations by 7 years apiece — putting it well beyond reality “by any reckoning”.

A “generation” is colloquially ~14-20 years, and “several” means 7+. Keiko’s high as balls again. 🤦🏽‍♂️

edit: if “several” generations “by any reckoning” were able to fit into ~85 years’ time, it would require 10yr olds becoming parents in each generation, consecutively. What the actual, Keiko. Words matter. Ew.

Too bad your next promotion’ll be the front lines, troll. Good luck.

Don’t disparage pedophiles by association. They’re altogether vile and unfathomably sick in the head, but this fuck-smear? Far worse

Thank the gods for the article, then. That simple phrase alone can’t possibly carry the deep complexity of that convoluted concept. Whew.

Way to keep with the redundant theme. 🙂

You wanna not perpetuate the clickbait BS, and just give us the “detail”, FFS? 🤦🏼‍♂️

edit: It’s a completely shit “article” of a mere four sections of limp, repetitive “quotes” drowned in ads, etc. that finally give up the ghost:

"…the folks that we’re focused on, those lower propensity voters that don’t always vote, they are tuning in and showing up at a higher level in support of the vice president.”

Heh.

Start with the 1%, and gauge response. Repeat with the 2% and add guillotines as set pieces, guage response. Lather, rinse, repeat until shit gets better. 🤘🏼

That’s edging toward muddying the point. You could also bring heritage (aka “race”) into the argument, or age, or disability, et al, and risk doing the same. No one’s debating granular data per geophysical location, etc., as this is a median national income bifurcation topic.