no, fuck you and af1
no, fuck you and af1
form an affinity group
it seems viability isn’t a firm concept
apparently Kamala wasn’t viable either
she was running against trump.
duverger’s law is no law, at all. it’s an undisprovable tautology.
first past the post, which naturally evolves into a two party system
this isn’t true.
if everyone who voted for a so-called third party had voted for the democrat, trump still would have won.
they didn’t catch him because of bad opsec, unless you consider Tor to be bad opsec. they caught him with a parallel reconstruction after the NSA illegally spied on him.
change my mind
it was to kill competition who were threatening to kill him. id say if the law won’t protect you, you are free to protect yourself
your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.
what you’re saying is that you personally did a big search yourself and couldn’t find anything that made you think Trump was thinking about doing this
no. i said what i meant. your article is irrelevant to the current controversy. putting words in my mouth is the height of bad faith interaction, though.
this is a years-old article, not relevant to the current controversy
pretty much no candidate ever has won the general election after a contested convention, so the smart play for the general was for the I pledged and superdelegates to present a united front in support of the nominee.
and give a big “fuck you” to anyone who wanted meaningful change.
who did the california delegates go to?
it did happen. it could have happened to somebody better.