We were living paycheck to paycheck before that inflation boom too.

Good lord they’re really telling on themselves with this one aren’t they?

deleted by creator

Yeah this kind of rhetoric doesn’t sound at all like a deranged psychopath who believes in exterminating the “other”…

deleted by creator

Why on Earth does the governor have that power? That’s not a state issue it’s a local issue. I could see the mayor having that power, I can’t understand why it’s in the jurisdiction of the governor.

No I’m saying that when you get rid of the the reformer who actually wants to go after malfeasance and fraud and replace her with somebody who’s been approved by the billionaire donors, that person will not be a fight. What the Republicans are going to be against the person who just rubber stamps corporate malfeasance now? Congress rarely if ever shuts down over the pro corporate candidate. I think if you look at voting roles you’ll see a lot of agreement when it comes to those kind of things.

It’s not law you’re right it’s just happened every single new presidential term in the history of our country. Not turning in their resignation would be such a breach of etiquette that even I think it would be justified to fire her at that point, that’s how ingrained it is into the American system of government. But it won’t be a fight. She will hand in a resignation and if Harris wants to accept it there’s nothing anyone can do. There’s no politics involved. It’s just the executive.

Also the new nominee won’t be a fight.

That’s not exactly how it works. They don’t stay in place. Come January they will all offer their resignation. That’s how it works every new term. Harris of course can refuse to accept their resignations, and thus keep them in place. That’s not unheard of. However there’s no way she won’t offer her resignation. That’s why every new presidential term isn’t started with the new president publicly firing everybody.

I mean I hate the Cheneys more than most people on Lemmy, which believe me has come as quite a shock to see how popular they are on here, but even I wouldn’t describe them as magas.

I don’t see why you would need to provoke a confirmation fight if she doesn’t nominate her in the first place. Which is what I’m sure is going to happen.

I would love to see how you defend the argument that Iran doesn’t care about the US election results. That’d be a fascinating exercise to see done.

Frankly she’s already gone. Harris had way too many billionaire Tech Bros donors who are worried about being regulated in any way for her to keep what has been the best part of the Biden Administration by far.

Odd cuz if I did this there’d just be a warrant for my arrest released

Not entirely sure climate change couldn’t just be argued to be the cause of all the others there.

Changing climate did have a major impact on all of those Empires though.

The US already has elected judges, they’re so incredibly bad we barely even bother to write about it anymore. I know people talk about who are they beholden to? But that’s the irrelevant question actually. The real problem is a judge that’s elected has to campaign. And there’s no greater source of corruption in all of politics than campaigning. No amount of patronage will ever equal the amount of corruption that comes from going around and begging rich people for money so you can be elected.

Jesus Christ lady you’re not getting maga votes, stop trying.

Are they going to rebuild or they just trying to migrate and take over the Democratic Party? We have this tendency to assume that this country is going to be two parties just as they are right now for the rest of our time but parties have changed in America many times. Hell, these two parties virtually swap places once. Nothing says it can’t happen again.

God damn this was funny. Plot, characters, and writing aside. You wrote that and then continued on with your argument.