Easy. The ones with vowels are C library functions.
That’s the point. To make the low-population area more intense. Because relative to the population density, there were 100 times as many sightings. Or what am I missing.
There are a number of normalization algorithms. Easiest would be to just divide by the area’s population count. That gives you the relative number of bigfoot sightings or fursuits per capita, removing any skews introduced by varyin population size.
Say you have two areas:
Area 1: 100000 people, 1000 fursuits, 500 bigfoot sightings Area 2: 1000 people, 10 fursuits, 5 bigfoot sightings
Without knowing the population size, it looks like more fursuits means more bigfoot sightings. But if we divide by the population size, we get 0.01 fursuits and 0.005 bigfoot sightings per person in both areas.
Hope that helps. ^^
Now normalize it for population density.
If it would mean things getting cheaper for poor people, it wouldn’t even be all that bad of an idea.
Well, except for the privacy issues, obv.
I’ll shed a tear either way.
I mean, I’m complaining about my family and friends caring about me. xD
I do this weird thing where I know real people in real life who also know my birthday.
What are those headphones on the right side. They look sick.
I try to check my mail every day and delete all that are not necessary to keep. I have rarely failed so miserably at anything else.
Wait until you find out that I also use Emacs.
I will not open that link. I will not open that link. I will not open that link.
Well, as long as it’s just a hungry pack of wolves and not a pack of hungry wolves.
I’d say it’s a lazy Sunday and they’re staying in bed until 12.
Kinda like biology: knock out a gene (package) and see what happens.
You gotta pump those numbers up, those are rookie numbers.
That’s the moon. Tech bros just invented the moon.