Depends on how big the car is.

I absolutely would download a car.

My sister had a pad thst goes under her sheets that when it got wet it rang an alarm and she had to chart the piss puddle.

She hasn’t wet the bed for 50 years.

It’s the white man in Hammersmith Palais

Watch the movie “Syndecoche NY”

Have you considered being a foster parent and get paid to have a live in babysitter?

The set number of renewals locks in the price and generally also allows the customer to not renew if that is their desire.

I thought he was on Ozempic?

Usually a pet fee of $25 to $50.

Just pointing out that “filling it up” is not so simple always. On a road trip, you generally rely on DC Fast Chargers since an L2 charger would take hours.

If Tesla went belly up and took the charging network with it, EVs would be much less useful for road trips.

Depends actually. If Tesla shut down, that would disrupt a lot of fast charging. The charger handshakes with the car which allows it to auto bill to your card stored on Tesla’s servers. For non-Teslas, they have to use the app to start charging.

Seeing as my car works when an internet connection is not available it will work. The bigger issue is charging networks. If Tesla went belly up, then charging on their network (L2 chargers should be fine unless they configured to not be free) would be dicey.

This group is claiming that “a natural-born citizen has to be born in the US to parents who are citizens when the child is born” though. That means that the child in my example is not a natural born citizen by this group’s rules. If this group’s interpretation prevails, then that child, who obviously would not go on to be naturalized, was not really a citizen at all because one of their parents was not naturalized.

If this was the law, I’m not sure why you assume that these non-citizens would not get naturalized? My family moved to the US when I was young and I became a naturalized citizen when I was in college.

That further means, again by this group’s logic, any decedents from such a union would also not really be citizens because none of their children would go on to be naturalized before having children of their own. Any US citizen with an ancestor who was born to a non-naturalized immigrant (at the time of birth) is not actually a natural born citizen.

I don’t know why you think no one would get naturalized in this scenario?

that child is a natural born citizen because they were born in the USA (birthright citizenship) to an American citizen.

If you are born in the USA, your parent’s citizenship is irrelevant. Have you ever heard the term “anchor baby”? Also, if one of your parents is a US Citizen then you are a US Citizen no matter where you were born. (There are some refinements to this that have changed over the years regarding how much time the parent has lived in the US) That’s what made the Obama thing so stupid — it doesn’t matter if he was born overseas, he’d still be a US citizen via his mother.

That’s not true. An immigrant can be a naturalized citizen and then bear offspring with another US citizen. The immigrant is not natural horn but their child is.

The nuns. That’s what the article is saying.

If you didn’t read it as Transgender woman (with some kind of disability) competing in Paralynpixs" then that’s a you problem.

Sounds good to me. I’d rather see him face justice but I’m just so fucking tired of him.

I’ll be voting for her in the primary tomorrow.

I saw your reply in my Inbox and hoped it was a reply on a Walz post and not the Ventura one.