It’s probably because the anti-Trump tweet is the only tweet that is actually reasonable out of all of those. I also think all of the tweets together could actually be used to try and say that anybody who is saying Trump is in the files is just a deranged Nazi. Thus all of them together is bad optics.

I don’t understand, what is the actual purpose of this rule?

ohhh, so a slightly different thing that is basically like a regular debit card account, but a bit more predatory? Got it. Ewww

Most prepaid cards such as prepaid visas can be checked for free on the site, no? That has been my experience anyway…

Oh ok, if that’s what it was actually about, I get disliking the format/channel. But I completely agree with you about not downvoting a relevant post.

It would appear that people hate criticism of Apple on this platform, based off of the downvotes. I am slightly surprised at that tbh. And I additionally beleive that just makes the point in the video about Apples “holier than thou” mentality more evidently true.

Folks, they are just another Corpo, please stop simping for them because they promised you the world. It’s all just sweet nothings and the evidence consistantly shows that.

3, 4, 2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5. Because tots are absolutely immaculate, and sweet potatos (tho good when roasted) are simply not the same kind of satisfying guilty pleasure as the rest.

could have turned my downvote into an upvote if you didn’t use that slur :/

command ‘pacman’ not found
aggressively re-pacstraps

If this was accurate, the ropes would have snapped and Homer would go hurddling to the base of the mountain.

This just in: The threat of losing your job and trying to find another one in an economy where living is constantly getting more expensive results in an increased level of fear, anxiety, and deppression…

Linux Mint DE and Arch, the ultimate duo of Stability/Freindlyness & Power/Control

Linux Mint DE and Arch, the ultimate duo of Stability/Freindlyness & Power/Control

Am I the only one who beleives that it would have been a more effective arguement to try and use the 4th amendment instead of the 1st? Violating free speech is just a weak claim, but “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches…” seems quite relevent here. But I am also not a lawyer.