Of the two of us, I am the only one making a decision that would cause my vote to make an impact. You are extremely ignorant of the world and of very basic game theory. A lemmy.ml instance account, of course.

Too old and the dementia is hitting him hard. People are saying it is syphilis.

You’re deliberately ignoring the reality of FPTP voting and saying other people are uneducated. Again, please get a clue.

Tweeting, “hmm interesting,” about Nazis’ thoughts.

Are there two or three people mentioned in the headline? It is hard to tell.

Yes, there is, the other option will advance the nation faster into full theocratic fascism. If you cannot tell one of the two viable options is less awful you need to get a clue.

A pro-Nazi television host who used to have a lot of air time on Fox. He hired white supremacists to write his topics. It was obvious to everyone with multiple brain cells that he is a far-right racist.

Yes, by me. I have been making that accusation for years whenever the topic comes up.

“Oh, these policies are a step back. Welp, let’s let Mr. Dictator Day One do some more insurrection from the Oval Office, that’ll fix the country.”

I would argue that. FPTP, you either vote tactically or the vote doesn’t count towards the final results. That’s not real democracy to me.

That’s correct. Intent is the only thing that matters, not results. Fun fact: your fictional candidate will get the same number of EC votes as Stein.

My definition of “just fine” isn’t a weird little Android spinoff. TV should have a normal input selector, maybe a settings menu.

Again, you don’t understand what the term means. I invite you to read the wikipedia examples to familiarize yourself.

The ad hominem part is specifically trying to discredit your arguments on the basis of an unrelated trait. They’re making no attempt to do any such thing. It’s rude, sure. But there’s no argument in there. Read the examples in the wiki.

Ad hominem is more like whining, “you all downvoted me but didn’t reply,” with the implication that the position is correct because of their actions. “Shut up,” isn’t an ad hominem, it’s just rude.

Yes. Do you need it explained to you further?

If you’re saying Dems are as bad as Repubs you are either delusional or deliberately disregarding reality. Of course it is the latter, since you are on here campaigning for Donald every day.

That’s not what an ad hominem is. Unsurprising that you don’t understand that, since you also think “Blue MAGA” is a real thing.

Isn’t the alarm system climate scientists? It is going off, and nobody is doing anything other than ignoring it.

You’re using Donald’s quote to pretend Dems are as bad as the guy you’re campaigning on behalf of.

Option A:

“I couldn’t possibly do even a single action that would make me even slightly complicit in the genocide from either side,” while spending all day campaigning for everyone to vote the same way as MAGAs want them to, “in fact, the Dems are so far right that they are literally indistinguishable from theocratic authoritarians promising to deliver a dictatorship.”

Option B:

“Well, he cannot do worse than this,” regarding a guy who blasted Yemen and wants to “finish the job” in Gaza, “and this will force the Dems to move left to get voters next election, after voting is abolished, they certainly won’t move rightward looking for people who will actually vote.”