They actually tried using a West German state of the art police robot but it failed. IIRC it still sits broken on the roof to this day.
They actually tried using a West German state of the art police robot but it failed. IIRC it still sits broken on the roof to this day.
Well obviously with the block chain, duh.
Nice. Now make a TV that doesn’t need updates. Hint: Drop the internet connection.
It lines up for me on Jerboa
Can confirm, it looked better as a pitch black blob.
And a 5th: Advertising.
This will level the playing field a lot since Google wouldn’t be able to subsidise their browser with ad money in order to show more ads in their search engine as well as feed their ads with data from the use of all their products.
Not really. It is just translating the Windows system API calls into Linux system API calls. It’s not emulating Windows, it’s an entirely different implementation that doesn’t necessarily match that of Microsoft’s implementation. It had it own workarounds to make buggy code work.
You wouldn’t call a Java Virtual Machine an emulator of another JVM either, they’re just different implementations of the same specification.
I’m currently looking at onedev.io for personal and startup use but since I haven’t had an opportunity to test it out yet I can’t vouch for it. It looks cool though and seems to have a good rep.
Funny, the forced indentation is what I hate about Python. If you think a missing semicolon can be hard to catch, don’t ever think about a missing whitespace :p
The end
keyword really isn’t a big deal for me. I find it to be a good way to easily spot the end of a method. But if you wouldn’t like it I’d still find it a good compromise to avoid syntax issues due to whitespace.
Can’t your read? It’s not a flamethrower!
I think you’ll like Ruby. It has mostly done away with braces and code blocks end with end
, e.g.
def create
unless admin redirect_to new_session_path and return
@product = Product.new product_params
if @product.save
flash[:success] = "New product has been created!"
redirect_to edit_product_path(@product) and return
else
flash[:error] = "Something went wrong!
render :new
end
end
This is working code that I simplified a bit from an old project of mine.
Why is Microsoft defending Crowdstrike?
I didn’t find any posts that meet the criteria.
It could be OC or not. Who knows really.
Beep Boop, I’m not a bot.
Neither do .dk domains, but in order to determine use the courts will have to be involved. I haven’t heard about a lot of those cases, but I’d guess you can prove use against the person who wants to take the domain. If I have a domain called firstnamelastname.dk it’d be pretty easy to show that I got a mail address at contact@firstnamelastname.dk that’s in use.
I simply don’t get why domain squatting is legal. On my ccTLD it is absolutely illegal meaning you have to forfeit the domain if you don’t use it anymore.
Link is to classic xkcd comic, not furry porn
Damn, you got my hopes up for a second there.
I prefer a 35mm film roll and a piano. It’s a bit easier to store.
Code should always by itself document the “how” of the code, otherwise the code most likely isn’t good enough. Something the code can never do is explain the “why” of the code, something that a lot of programmers skip. If you ever find yourself explaining the “how” in the comments, maybe run through the code once more and see if something can be simplified or variables can get more descriptive names.
For me, that’s what was originally meant with self-documenting code. A shame lazy programmers hijacked the term in order to avoid writing any documentation.
What’s the difference?
So MariaDB will explode halfway to Japan?