As your link states these are just early access limitations.
As your link states these are just early access limitations.
What would be the point of putting in the effort to make Bluesky or other ATProtocol apps selfhostable if they didn’t want people to do that? Doesn’t make any sense
Do you mean my Lemmy profile? Thank you I guess
How can it be EEE if it’s their own protocol?
Also there is much more open source from Bluesky: https://github.com/bluesky-social
Yes I know what upcoming updates are. What else is missing in Bluesky?
Which are coming with the next Bluesky update.
That can be difficult if your livelihood depends on it. Artists for example.
What features are missing compared to Mastodon?
I used to run multiple containers with TrueNAS Scale through their apps system (not as a VM in TrueNAS) and it was very unstable. I constantly had to fix something and the apps had constant updates even though there were no updates to the apps itself. It was really annoying to work with. I switched to Fedora Server and it has been much better since.
Jack Dorsey is not involved in Bluesky anymore.
That’s what I thought.
deleted by creator
that honestly had me wondering just how the FritzBox knows the ISP doesn’t allow it, but that’s a different topic
Because the Fritzbox uses a DS-Lite tunnel.
deleted by creator
Bluesky itself is not open source
Am I missing something? https://github.com/bluesky-social
At that point they said that they wouldn’t go forward with Recall in the current state. It was never in question that it would come eventually. The question was in what state?
I wish we could leave behind this stupid naming scheme.
Same. It’s amazing. I really like the feature where you can prioritise or deprioritise search results from certain websites.
They didn’t.
Maybe Krita is the solution to your problem?