And I’m on NVIDIA, so no Wayland for me yet.

4090 user here with nvidia-open and wayland works fine?

My first distro was debian and why I switched was that I wanted up to date packages.

I would suggest Arch with KDE plasma, I don’t have a stylus so can’t vouch for it personally but I’ve seen it mentioned in the update notes alot.

That was a huge rant, i also don’t like the microsoft authenticator so guess what i don’t use it, and the issue of your private keys to getting stolen if your pc is hacked has long been solved with password protected keys.

All of these issues pretty much amount to nothing, the standard works and is more secure then passwords, same reason as to why enabling password login on SSH is not recommended.

I mean the US has fielded and expanded GBI for years now and no nuclear war has broken out.

As an EU citizen hearing daily how putin threatens to kill us all I’m glad we are investing into missile defense aswell, instead of our lives being in the hands of a madman.

Windows users when they see a wine user???

I’m glad wsl exists so I don’t have to bother with windows and people can still run my programs.

I’m trying to understand how this is used, my current selfhosted setup is quite simple:

frontend - backend - vllm

Using the openai compatible api vllm returns with tool calls that need to be handeled by the backend, an results are then send to the frontend by the backend, the frontend never communicates with vllm directly.

Form what i can gather AG-UI is a way for the frontend to directly communicate with in my case vllm in a secure way? letting the frontend handle the tool calls?

That’s not a “hidden kill switch” that’s just blocking his account, that lemmy admins can ban your account doesn’t mean lemmy has a “hidden kill switch”.

wielded by a 93 year old man no less, but no i’m sure the officers feared for their lives…

I’ve used waypipe and it worked in my testing.

Assuming they don’t just do that anyway

I’m willing to bet pharma lobbying

Reliability and defense systems, lets say you need 100 warheads for credible deterrence.

Your missiles have a success rate of 80% so no you need 120. The enemy defenses shoot down 50% so now you need 240.

So to guarantee the 100 warhead deterrence you already need 240 warheads, and this number only increases further.

We are gonna SAVE AMERICA by TARRIFFING EVERYTHING but also exempting everything from these tariffs.

The same was said when the ATGM was invented. Yet the tank survived all the same.

And with APS becoming more and more common i predict we will continue to see tanks on the battlefield.

Haven’t you heard? Breathable air is DEI now.

With T-55s and T-62s still being used in this conflict I think this proves exu’s point.

A vehicle that can protect against small arms fire while lobbing 105mm HE shells is still very useful for infantry fire support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_germicidal_irradiation

No, but i am saying i would rather not drink disinfectants.