Overall. I wonder, if somebody gives me a Lambo, can I sell it, buy a bus, and drive friends in it?

I wonder which one is more expensive, a new Lamborghini or a new bus.

You mean just take the bus?

Yes, but… Let’s say papers A, B, and C are introducing methods. Often, each paper will choose to show the benchmarks in which their tool was the best. In reality, each tool might be better for a different task. If you understand the tools, and have gotten used to this kind of papers, you will probably get what each tool is good for. But the papers themselves are misleading, and people often just blindly use the “cutting edge” for everything.

"I shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt.”

This sounds like basically every description of modern digital/statistical tool

Let the 5-year-old watch Shrek or sth.

Subversive. By mocking an extreme, you want to avoid the main issue here: Marvel is a toxic shithole normalized by aggressive marketing.

Well, yeah, I guess they remove smoke detectors from their houses, as they could create smoke anxiety when a fire breaks out ¯_(ツ)_/¯