It’s useful for my firmware development, but it’s a tool like any other. Pros and cons.
It’s useful for my firmware development, but it’s a tool like any other. Pros and cons.
One success at thwarting fraud doesn’t mean that all attempts are thwarted though, it only proves that fraud is happening. That’s the problem.
I agree that he was pretty hostile but it’s Fox News. To be expected.
But she’s the sitting Vice President. “Yes, madam Vice President.” or at least “Yes, ma’am./madam.” is the appropriate way to reference her though.
Five years ago the audience would have fawned all over this kind of crap.
It’s good to see people are wise to his stock pumping strategy now.
ls that the kind of man you need? Loquacious type?
It’s intentional.
Obviously, Google makes money showing ads during search. But they have finally bit the bullet and starting tarpitting users in search in order to show more ads.
A quick, useful, and accurate search means that you’re on their site for the least amount of time, perhaps mere seconds. That’s not what’s best for revenue growth.
PS: Go try Kagi and be reminded what good clean search results look like. I use it because my time has value. It’s very good.
And a crematorium.
Not just the best press conference of 2020, but one of the most hilarious political fuck-ups of my lifetime. And I’m a Boomer.
How is throwing your vote into a hole going to help exactly?
I’m 60. I would argue that 20 years is not a long time. Keep pushing.
Islay Scotland has burned a shitton of peat over the last couple of centuries to make malt whisky and it’s very small. Wonder how much if their elevation they’ve burned?
Change won’t come overnight (at least without revolution). Like evolution, it requires constant pressure on the system. Changes that are too radical kill the organism.
A long as people think we can jump from Geoge H.W. Bush to Bernie Sanders in one election it’s going to continue to fail.
Votw Harris this time. Vote for the person slightly more liberal than her next time, etc. It’s a process.
Maybe not directly…
Guess I’m out of the loop. Who’s Elmo?
Yes, he has played a significant role in past elections all the way back to Reagan, and you haven’t noticed.
He’s an intellectual pundit that was on Fox News until 2017. He writes political commentary for the Washington Post; his column currently appears in 415 newspapers.
He won a Pulitzer Prize for commentary.
He continues to appear on MSNBC to this day.
He’s also considered to be a baseball expert who has written extensively on the subject including his own book. Their “baseball fan” comment was intended to be cute, I think.
Unfortunately, as an erudite pundit, most people that would be swayed by him to vote for Harris are smart enough to have decided to do so on their own.
Because think of how Trump is now. Now add two, three, or four more years to his obvious decline.
Even if he doesn’t end democracy, they’re afraid he could literally end the Republican party.
I commend you, but it’s a losing battle.
It really grates on me when I read “sike”.
I’ll pour one out for the Yaris.