SkavarSharraddas

Already showing us how he wants to protect women.

Canceling votes is a good start, but they shouldn’t limit it to people they know, and even if all votes are cancelled, you still need more to actually win.

I’m advocating for the outcome where the candidate that doesn’t want to jail their opponents and use the military against protestors wins, so that you can continue to make your disagreement with parts of their policy known.

I’m glad to see that you’re doing more than just voting, which I was advocating for in the first post you answered.

You agreed that either Trump or Harris will win. Your vote can only threaten one of them, by voting for the other or an alternative candidate. Same with not voting, the winner won’t care about your missing vote.

That means no action you take in the election will harm both candidates, ergo there is no way to vote against both of them.

The current system (or voter inertia) doesn’t allow you to vote against both. One of them will win, your only decision is which one you want (or despise less). If your vote doesn’t threaten their win, then when you vote for neither you’re voting for the winner.

“If I can’t have zero genocide then I don’t care to vote against the candidate that is very likely to be even worse.”

Especially with only two candidates with a chance of winning, a vote doesn’t mean unconditional support for everything that candidate wants. Sucks, but if you want to make your wishes known more specifically, you have to do more than just vote (if even that) and complain on the internet.

Audiobooks have a simple workaround if you can find a version of the book in text format to download, just index that.

Calibre can create a full text index to search through everything (well, for files that actually contain the text, and it needs a lot of space).

“Free speech” just means “I want to spout garbage without pushback (like fact checking) or consequences.”

Since they don’t seem to care about it, start using “tweet” for every social media post to devalue them further.

Why aren’t those clowns laughed out of the room as soon as they open their mouths?

We haven’t solved the “disposal” question of using fossil fuels, and those turned out (or were known along) to cause much bigger problems.

Number 10 Downing Street, the address of the UK Prime Minister’s Office.

He kinda did answer, basically “we’ll have import tariffs to pay for all we need including child care” while making it sound like other countries would pay for it. But of course that’s stupid because the money will come from the people who buy the imported goods, i.e. Americans.

Weirdo in chief.

They’re such a bunch of weird cockwombles.

Why does he need a defense? We already know he’s weird.

Tax them out of existence.

What an insight, he must be a tactical genius.