Great moment to work for it… And it is possible that a minor percentage than that also will be enough, according to the autor of the rule.

Another interesting interview for better understand this investigations is the one done by David McRaney in his podcast You Are Not so Smart. He is a great host and solve many wrong ideas that comes to peoples mind (me included) when you listen the rule for the first time.

You Are Not So Smart: 313 - The 3.5 Percent Rule - Erica Chenoweth

Página del episodio: https://youarenotsosmart.com/

Archivo de medios: https://stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/aa9f2648-25e9-472a-af42-4e5017da38cf/episodes/2512fbaa-aa0a-406c-9829-7c1d58ff70d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=aa9f2648-25e9-472a-af42-4e5017da38cf&awEpisodeId=2512fbaa-aa0a-406c-9829-7c1d58ff70d6&feed=N5eKDxJI

Yeah, and being a counter force within the intention of not permitting that to happen by generating division between the protesters for example. Still, the point of the 3,5% rule is not like something written in a stone, just a statical analysis who have that fact and investigation is not finished, and new events may demonstrate something else.

Must be very interesting. I previously listen she in David McRaney’s podcast YouAreNotSoSmart with not knowing what about that rule and understand that is not like a stone rule, and more an statistical analysis who shows that even minor percentages of people can make it. I’m sure that in the video that you refers, she solves many of the doubts that that such a statement generates.

Wondering what you may mean by “The real story behind why Iran didn’t — or couldn’t — strike back”. As long as we know they do, and they strike Tel Aviv.

And you’re doing self promotion and expecting to getting pay to read what you presumably comply without offering anything here. I think that is not correct.

There is bit difference between provoked and "self-defense*. We are just being said by Israel that every action they commit is by self-defense, even when they are attacking or doing a f**cking livestream genocide.

The narrative that Israel apologists uses don’t have comparation (well maybe one famous genocide), so equal those terms is just misleading.

When she said provoked she means that the US do what’s doing to Iran, I mean they are pretending to be negotiating crossing red lines that makes that impossible and when they are ready just attack. So, not, she was not saying Ukraine invasion was justified by “self-defense” like Israelis do, she was just illuminating what happens when you cross all red lines in aggression to other country.

Sure, like they are in control of every Israel actions.

Thats not what you said, you are defending Israel and the violence they are doing all over. That’s why you’re just like them, you are ok blowing up everything but them you are acting like you don’t.

If you oppose Israel genocide and the violence spiral they and USA are promoting, just do us all a favor and be coherent not justifying Israel’s acts. And just in case you want to deviate attention, Iran must not have nuks, thats where we agree, but with these attacks they (Israel - USA) are just saying to Iran that diplomacy was just a joke and putting Iran closer to get nuks to dissuade this kind of military interventions.

Sorry but USA isn’t being dragged into war… They have full knowledge and participation of what happens, so you must assume that is coming to a war for his own… It’s not a pour innocent baby that have no involving… The opposite it’s just being naive

And when he/she said “all the evil those countries are doing” we must assume that is not talking about Israel nor USA, the major terror states, just the evil arabs. It’s so nasty and incongruent that don’t even justifies to waste your time to reason with a war propagandist.

Also Dems if you read the article, don’t forget that previously some of them worked hard to reach the same thing…

deleted by creator

A lot more than under dictatorship law… And I guess than Just the necessary to continue doing their job

You’re right, it’s something that is happening and could be good too. But you’re also missing the point. It’s the massive application of AI on all kinds of areas including social media, communications and the intrusive forms of nourish that kind of systems with your data almost every time without our consent. Without and option to opt-out or better not being involved in all that shit that consumes a lot of water and energy, and its being overestimated.

Well said… So you can see how nasty are things right now in USA and in Israel. Thanks to lobbism and Trumps Admin “Israel First” and his total an “absolute commitment” to Israel genocidal policies.

To be clear, the article is about people who don’t wanna use AI and hes chois or not to do it in a personal level. No an impose to those who embrace AI. Is more like if a person can chose to say not to AI, or in words from the article “those who are left behind is widening and becoming a social barrier”.