We were considering tehachapi until visiting and seeing trump flags everywhere. Plenty of places in OC too. Buy definitely a vast minority in the state

I feel like DS9 imagined a 2024 where liberals had morphed into champagne socialists, providing a social safety net to assuage guilt for their treatment of the people disadvantaged by society but keeping them out of sight. In reality the liberal parties stymie the left and work to keep government moving to the right so that the basic safety net never gets implemented. Instead we have neoliberals and party liners still obsessed with reaching across the aisle and shaking hands with those who would advocate for a ‘final solution’ to homelessness before voting to feed them. Thats not just America, look at Macron too.

Thats crazy I used IDOL for a decade. Good riddance.

Y’know it is discontinued and has a lot of dangerous settings but I just pulled a cve count and you may be on to something.

IE - 44 https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-26/product_id-9900/hasexp-1/Microsoft-Internet-Explorer.html

Chrome - 3448 https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1224/product_id-15031/Google-Chrome.html?page=1&order=1&trc=3348&sha=df0aa69c2223c5a8cefdcbb89a03bda7058b5b01

Internet explorer makes you naked for sure.

Chrome maybe in swim trunks at a shopping mall. Everyone (advertisers etc) can see you and you’re weirdly exposed.

I learned that she isnt aware burning the flag is protected as free speech.

I saw her release condeming protestors and calling them Hamas supporters.

If even CNN is forced to admit it and you still deny it, you are kind of beyond reason… being honest there is not a source you would accept, is there?

You dont believe that Juan Guaido and his interim government was a us backed coup attempt?

https://www.cnn.com/americas/live-news/juan-guaido-venezuela-operation-freedom-live-updates/index.html

https://apnews.com/general-news-637d6ccb184c4c5b9d74a8cbd449ac73

https://apnews.com/general-news-86d9244b3b8e436398cc206f9b70d4bd

Ah I didnt think about that, I guess its a reason to appoint to a committee but national position seems disproportionate imo

Why does everyone seemingly like Kelly? His voting record is on the right of most other dems, is it just astronaut and good husband optics doing the heavy lifting ?

I cast Gun, Prepare to meet God!

Grifters gonna grift! You’ll find a lot of hypocrisy if you look for anything more than a glance.

Rerun was a character played by Fred Berry on the hit 1970’s sitcom, “Whats Happening” - but thats not important right now.

Oof those are some fashy dog whistles. Equating Democrat voters with outsiders and migrants, implying to their base that true Americans are white conservatives. Lying is only one small provable part but not even the worst of it.

Voted for Marianne Williamson who had already withdrawn because A) she was the only other choice on the ballot and B) She is actually great in interviews. Dont agree with some of her conclusions but you can tell she is studied on political theory…

Dont think that really counts. The primary was yet another illusion of choice by the DNC who has proven they will make backdoor moves to nominate whoever they want since the days of Debbie Wasserman shultz and hillary

Yeah DS9 was good, but it took me a long time to get past the fact that they made the Federation freaking space NATO. Martial law, biological weapons on your own citizens, papers please, most with the subtext (or lengthy deleted personal log) that morality is for peace time, and some of your favorite values should be abandoned when the stakes are high.

I think ENT is the most conservative tbh. Who else would go that far to get revenge for Florida?

I was pretty bummed when she lost the Senate race

The Court now confronts a question it has never had to answer in the Nation’s history: Whether a former President enjoys immunity from federal criminal prosecution. The majority thinks he should, and so it invents an atextual, ahistorical, and unjustifiable immunity that puts the President above the law.

The majority makes three moves that, in effect, completely insulate Presidents from criminal liability. First, the majority creates absolute immunity for the President’s exercise of “core constitutional powers.” Ante, at 6. This holding is unnecessary on the facts of the indictment, and the majority’s attempt to apply it to the facts expands the concept of core powers beyond any recognizable bounds. In any event, it is quickly eclipsed by the second move, which is to create expansive immunity for all “official act[s].” Ante, at 14. Whether described as presumptive or absolute, under the majority’s rule, a President’s use of any official power for any purpose, even the most corrupt, is immune from prosecution. That is just as bad as it sounds, and it is baseless. Finally, the majority declares that evidence concerning acts for which the President is immune can play no role in any criminal prosecution against him. See ante, at 30–32. That holding, which will prevent the Government from using a President’s official acts to prove knowledge or intent in prosecuting private offenses, is nonsensical.

Sotomayor dissenting opinion