• 0 Posts
  • 188 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 8th, 2025

help-circle

  • I’ve explained it to you twice. I’m going to use small words, this time.

    “States rights,” is the right of the state government to pass it’s own laws.

    The right to fight a law in the courts belongs to individual persons, not the state government. If the state government disliked a law, they would not go through the courts, they would just change the law.

    “States rights” are for the state government, not the people of the state. Nothing the state government does to the people of that state can go against the rights of the state government, because the people do not have states rights, because they are not states.

    Just so we are clear, you are not a state, are you? If you happen to be New Jersey, for example, I could understand your confusion.






  • . . . What exactly do you think “starts rights” means?

    Because it refers to the right of states to pass laws for their own inhabitants, and the federal government had no right to interfere except in the specific cases the constitution says that it can. In this case, Texas is trying to pass laws for its own inhabitants, and trying to keep the federal government from interfering because the constitution doesn’t specifically call out this area for federal oversight.

    Setting aside for a moment their specific goal, this is exactly in line with their stated value of “starts rights.”

    Republicans do plenty of terrible things to criticize them for, and they never miss a good chance to be hypocritical, but it’s odd that you’re calling them out for hypocrisy on one of the very rare cases when they are not.




  • I’m not a huge fan of intrinsically connecting medication for sexual function with medication for gender-affirming care.

    If that were the case, then bottom-surgery wouldn’t be gender affirming care either.

    Or maybe I’m just misunderstanding the entire concept. To date, I’ve never seen a single concrete statement on the topic that doesn’t upset someone (discounting bloody right-wingers for whom the entire concept is upsetting, bless their hearts) because it somehow invalidates someone else.

    However, we seem to be in agreement that these people are raging assholes, and that’s the important takeaway.