… you were saying?
… you were saying?
deleted by creator
This is a good take, I liken it to iodine in salt.
However, I worry about the effects of fluoride in groundwater. I don’t know if I should be too concerned about that per se, but I hear some plants hate it and that and it says in the ground for like forever.
Come on now, I don’t want to get in an argument with a dumbass, but the Beverley character had some fine moments.
I’ll give you ghost sex, and collapsing universes, but she was pleasant. Really she was there for to give Picard more emotional dynamism.
Pulaski was kinda baller though, I liked her. She had opinions and wasn’t afraid to express them. Even better she would reevaluate them upon have more data. I have a 3D printer named after her. I print my with my favorite plastic on it, TPU.
Something something net neutrality?
As an aging millennial, I am surprised by how the process of time works.
Like you spend your life acquiring skills and using your knowledge in an ever expanding cornucopia of experiences.
Then followed by a gradual decline to be left only with your memories of who you once were. But then you realize you were only a small part of the existence of others, and ultimately the universe. Yep, the thought of faculties diminishing over time is enough to put the one into an extensional crisis.
I sure hope not. Harris is a sure fire way to a Trump presidency.
How about Mark Kelly?
I think 1/4 to 1/2 of the American public disagrees.
For what it’s worth, I don’t think we should ever speak his name or acknowledge his existence kinda like shunning and the Amish.
OMG, Pareto analysis… so sexy.
I am not sure what’s going on with all of these stoner Beverly memes, but I like it!
Ok this is good
Oh, I’ll have to check out peertube. Thanks for the information.
I wonder if some form of bit torrent client may be of use here.
I’m not sure what comment to reply to, but I feel obligated to remind people that the sun is a fusion reaction.
EVs
Also, just cause they allot the land doesn’t mean they will build it. Now excuse me, while go read the article.
Viewed from a historical perspective, it’s hard to see how the non-incombent didn’t have a really good advantage.
Hindsight can always be 20/20, and think a Buttigieg/Kelly ticket would have done a bit better. Buttigieg has been in charge of infrastructure, which I believe has been well run. He’s from the rust belt, and is more familiar with the working class vs the candidate with California Progressive with a DA background.
Ultimately though, I think the fault lies with the Democratic Party hijacking the primary process.