But seriously tho, yeah, NSFW in the absence of another more specific tag.
Some people are recovering from addiction and stuff, good to give them a way to filter it out
But seriously tho, yeah, NSFW in the absence of another more specific tag.
Some people are recovering from addiction and stuff, good to give them a way to filter it out
Maybe we need a new tag:
ANFW
absolutely necessary for work
Now I need to look up corgi cults 🤔
Sure it’ll add years to your life (sentence)
That’s a wild interpretation of what they said.
Dude described a branding problem, not a technical problem.
Oh God, the compression.
You’re gonna bring back deep fried memes again
Omg mine too (too embarrassing to share).
I forgot how much more patient with pacing we all used to be back in the 00s. Just trusting that the video would go somewhere and there’d be a payoff.
Looking at some of the popular videos from back then, people these days would just scroll away because nothing hooked their attention quickly enough. Myself included. We’ve been trained to expect such quick payoff 😭.
Fuck, now I’ma have to go check on my old deviantart account.
Samantha knew what she had to do, when her new Ring doorbell began to send her the MKUltra activation code.
Yeah, and that’s… Ok.
But I’d like something that was more visible without going into the comments, so people could see it in their feed
I wonder if we need some kind of middle ground like Twitter where you leave the content up, with a big banner saying “this content is bullshit and here is the evidence”?
While I agree that harmful information should probably be hidden so that impressionable people don’t act on it, I also don’t like non-experts being the arbiters of censorship.
What is the diffe between “factual reporting” and “credibility rating”?
I am a furry to get competent IT support
Social media sucks.
But I can’t live without it.
I think more likely is that the news outlets need the revenue from clicks, and are willing to trade their reputation to get them. Accurate science journalism doesn’t pay, capitalism is a race to the bottom.
I imagine the legal team’s hands were tied, this smells like a corporate mandate.
I’m guessing that the legal team didn’t have a case, but corporate told them to fight it anyways, so some legal intern just threw some wild shit at the wall and the more senior layers were like “well, we got nothing else. If corporate wants us to fight it, this is all we got”
Sorry, the best I can do is passive aggressiveness and righteous indignation
The data needs to be sent from the voter to the server that owns the post. But the server that owns the post can anonymize the data before it sends it to clients or other servers.
That said I don’t have deep understanding of activitypub. Its possible that something would prevent this, like if votes made their way to the server that owns the post by way of telephone game rather than directly from the client or the user’s home server. But that seems like an unreasonable design, so I doubt (hope not) that is the case.
Yeah, and I think that’s the argument about making it public.
But access rights to stuff seems like the kind of thing that should be configurable, even if it requires a change and isn’t backwards compatible
I think you mean Saddam Hu**bean**