People with 6+ figure salaries who think they get to rule the world they’ve done less than nothing to help create.

Google is literally anti-privacy so… “better than google” is … still not necessarily good.

Well if they didn’t even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph…

My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.

5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.

Linux isn’t that bad these days unless you want to use something silly and not supported by the manufacturers, like nVidia’s Optimus or other crap. Even then, the linux folks have it figured out. You can get step by step instructions for about any issue, even the complicated weird shit like Optimus.

IMO, “One app/library/etc does one thing only” is a rather ignorant form of wisdom about encapsulation, anyways.

Encapsulation is important regardless of how many disparate tasks a library handles. Doing one thing with one thing is a pretty good rule of thumb to get close to good results, but it is FAR from a golden standard, and serves to drag people away from the finer nuances of encapsulation.

The ONLY time it is a hard and fast rule is at the individual function level. A single function ideally should have one task to accomplish, even if that task has side effects.

I’m sure there are cross-dependency issues on an OS level that makes it a bit wiser to do for widely used system tasks, but to make it an absolute rule smacks of wisdom gone awry. Like not eating shellfish in the bible.

Which is precisely why it should be an instant, guaranteed, “no”.

Well, they are clowns, you can’t knock them too hard for trying to juggle so much. Now if only they could learn people don’t want to watch clowns any more…

Yea, don’t have to render all the pixels for full enjoyment, though I bet things like the UI would love the extra detail.

Either way, the industry has a greedy corpo problem, not a technological limitation problem.

The screens getting better pushes directly against graphics processing increases. More pixels takes more power, after all.

Not that it’s any excuse… Modern phones are more powerful than the Switch, by a long shot.

I really wish mobile games could be good, but this is modern capitalism: It’s not about careers and good products. It’s about extracting wealth.

Yes, the guy I replied to. They need to walk to their nearest college and learn how, “reading between the lines” is NOT about applying any and all conspiracy thinking to a subject…

Yea, eating up loads of screen space for controls and having a tiny screen are big negatives.

Processing power is waaaay less too, but that’s been a non-issue for indie quality style graphics for some years, now.

The entire market works off of freemium and piecemeal/ad models, too, which as Tim refuses to admit; people also hate!

Are you SERIOUSLY this stupid and triggered? They’ve said NOTHING about “woke” anything, and your dumb ass goes off like this is gamer gate? Fuck you. Fuck you, you illiterate moron.

This is about how Epic, the corporarion Tim Sweeny leads, a corpo that’s a big player in the games industry, is FAILING to identify that it is quality, not budget that determines if a game sells.

… and then you come in here saying GamerGate shit. Fuck off, you inflammatory dumbass. Seems like you need to get past Reddit culture, troll.

I felt that about many joints when I slacked off on working out for a few months in my 20s. I was still lifting enough to keep my muscles from too much atrophy, but my joints got… lazy? Dynamic motion and heavier weights suddenly felt (as suddenly as me taking exercise more serious again) like my joints were the limiting factor.

and then I overworked my arms and got something like tennis elbow and basically had to rehab myself back to being able to exercise, all without my muscles being the limiting factor!

Take care of your body, folks. You can go over 100% when you’re young, but your body makes you pay when you’re older!

Reminds me of the stories of the people who do crazy stuff on adrenalin rushes, like lift a car off their dying child, and then end up potentially hospitalized or otherwise extremely sore for months. I think I get it now…

All they have is their IP, which they keep shitting on. The unique Ubisoft “innovations” are a shittier launcher and removing games from people who paid for them if they don’t play.

Nobody should want to buy that shitshow except to gut it for IP.

Yet you still came out eith the heartless WRONG answer. Curious.

I thought it’d be a synagogue for Galactus.

Aim that thing at the fossil fuel companies that literally gaslighted the public for decades.

Only for judgemental pricks.

In either direction (being the prick or dealing with pricks).

Ubisoft deserves to drop to zero.