I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.
I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.
Except if you plant flowers. Bulbs taste awful.
IMHO, RFK jr is pro environment and anti big phama. He changes his policies based on fashion more than money. He is populist, not corporatist.
Both the Republican and Democrat parties are corporatist because of lobbying. Nothing to do with Trump. If we voted Hillary and Kamala then the same court outcome would occur.
How does a 1998 law have retroactive rights over previously published works?
Grobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180 (Del. 1988).
Directors in a business should:
It is a legal obligation.
Nope. There are these obligations but it is not illegal for a CEO to perform sub optimally, or even make multi year losses.
When I watched the 24 series I really wanted it to cut to Jack Bauer at least washing his hands afterwards.
Any art house film trying to portray reality.
Basic instinct interview
Even without musk it is still the worst iron man.
Whereas only 1 in 8 Democrats are openly sedititious traitors.
I’m seeing echos of 2016. I doubt this was a PR disaster for it’s target demographic.
Disagree. Diplomatic channels should always be open because alternative forms of communication are usually violent.
Keep a close eye on worldcoin.
Any PR person would have seen this as the disaster it was, but they can’t tell him no directly.
Your view is blinkered.
This has gotten Trump more press coverage than any advertising or rallies.
This only looks stupid to people who have already decided to vote for Harris.
Why will Musk go to jail (ignoring this bribery)?
The cost is spent, but the offices are still assets on the balance sheet.
If demand for offices is lower then all companies that own offices will have to revalue theirs downwards. These impairments have a direct impact on the P&L of the company accounts. Better to force employees to use these assets (and pay their own costs to do so) than show a (greater) accounting loss.
His nickname should be “Crime”.
The state certainly brings volume and that is leveraged for negotiations. There’s no way a new insurer could have that market share instantly.
This is why fact checks are bullshit. Reuters admits that
Now to make the statement false they bring in a strawman “Stated goal” condition and prove that particular part to be false, then claim that makes the whole thing false.
Such bullshit.