Needs more CAD

As a counterpoint; if you are being the armorer on a movie set and don’t know those things, then you should quit before something horrible happens.

Stupid is as stupid does.

They are better, but you foolishly assumed that they meant better for the consumer, not better for the seller.

They are unenforceable for more reasons than that. They also can not prove that you agreed to it, only that someone did.

Also, they can’t change the terms of your previous purchase after the fact. They can make you agree to something new going forward, but if they make your current device a brick because you don’t agree (which they are doing here), then they need to reimburse you for causing the loss of use of your device that you already purchased and was working under the previous terms.

“Some of you may die, but that’s a chance I’m willing to take.”

In many (most/all?) places, you are not allowed to vote for anyone except the people listed on the ballot. Writing in their own choice would be disqualifying their own vote, so I hope millions of them do it.

As an alternate viewpoint, I had T-Mobile for years, and I couldn’t keep a phone call connected for more than 10 minutes. If I travelled across the metro area (about 600K people), the call would drop 4 times from one side of the city to the other. Since I got on Verizon, it’s been bulletproof. I imagine these things are very location-dependent.

It’s google, they’ll just stop working on it.

There are conditional aspects to the ad-buy contracts. You only pay for the time if it’s used.

Or add 3% to the green grid

Three apps, plus still needing iTunes for podcasts. Thanks, Apple.

Bunch of jabronis

If we are still in the “someday, when we take it serious” timeline, then it’s probably too late anyway.

It’s easier said than done, but it’s not that difficult. It’s mostly reconfiguration of plumbing and zone controls on HVAC. The electrical is easier to distribute.

If you commit to doing it the right way, and tear it down to the structure (but leave the facade alone), it’s not terribly difficult.

The problem is that the building owners want to do it cheap, and it won’t be cheap. It will be more economical in the long run than fully vacant building though.

They’re not politicians, because they don’t have to run for election. They are probably political, though.

Yes, but actually no. They are looking NOW, because they are being forced to look. They apparently weren’t before, which is a sign of bad QA, and the scary part for the potential passengers.

I just want them to make it a KC Chiefs helmet full-time.

They can also be a sign of poor quality control and/or poor quality in general, which makes them newsworthy to people (potentially) entrusting their lives to the workmanship involved.

“highly sensitive”, LOL

If the FAA doesn’t delay the data, why should anyone else?