If the companies had to pay per bottle, do you really think they’d still be using single use packaging like that?

They’d install refill stations in stores and sell you a reusable bottle that you can fill up from their metered tap at the refill station.

Companies created the problem of single use packaging; the onus is not on individuals to solve a problem created by companies.

Uh, what? Are you defending companies stealing gift card money from people because it’s a “weird account on the books”?

If you are against violence and refuse to use it, sooner or later someone will use violence against you, and you will lose because you refuse to fight back.

What is your principle worth when you’ve been beaten to a bloody pulp?

This is what the paradox of tolerance addresses.

People who don’t do any of those actions are not active users. Lurkers are not active by definition.

They shouldn’t be included in the active user count, because they’re not contributing any activity.

That’s the whole point of a critic though. They’re supposed to be providing deeper takes rooted in expertise in the film industry.

I think part of the problem is that people think criticism is an inherently bad thing. That allows people to dismiss criticisms as being negative, rather than simply an observation of a flaw.

I like how varied this list is lol

Those are exactly the ones they’re talking about, except they said fan art instead.

Really fucked up fan art …

How much entertainment do you need while driving? Can’t you just plug your phone in for some music?

Do you really need a maps app built into your car when you already have one on your phone?

I just can’t see a reasonable use for an infotainment system that isn’t already taken care of perfectly by the device I already have.

The car experience

The car experience is driving.

We don’t need 6 different fuel efficiency visualizations and we sure as fuck don’t need games or videos in the car.