

Just a reminder that if you want to kill someone just use a car, you’ll have better than even odds of getting away with it
Just a reminder that if you want to kill someone just use a car, you’ll have better than even odds of getting away with it
Look…more intentional consequences
That won’t happen short of a civil war
Can’t think of a more deserving company
I’m not sure there’s a lot of love between DOGE and the GAO
We got exactly what we voted for
As much as I’d like to see the Koch’s take it on the chin i hope he wins this one.
To late you enabled this
I use the entire proton suite and would recommend them
The NSA was founded in the early 50’s not post 9/11.
Carrying out the will of the people is not a judges role, especially the supreme court.
They’re not looking to prevent violence they’re looking to isolate violence.
Prison has never and will never be a deterrence
But it will take the people who commit violence against women off the street. There are times when prison is not about rehabilitation its simply about removing danger.
Surprising no one
OK…what exactly does that have to do with gender based fitness tests?
Which is precisely why the Army came up with ACFT 20 years of war in the middle east taught us what soldier need to be combat effective, so let’s just keep it.
I don’t like to comment to much on the military since its what I’ve done most of my adult life and I’ve seen a lot of changes in the last 25 years. The ACFT took almost 20 years to develop so unless they just go back to the APFT or the Marine Corps fitness test and only use the men’s criteria the test won’t be ready before he’s gone.
The intent is to make military service even less appealing to women.
This isn’t most people it’s EU staff