I cannot believe I need to spell this out for you.

Nazis are fascists.

Oh no! Leopards ate their faces. What a shame. Who could have seen this coming from fascists.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat

Such paragons of morality, they started out by trying to ensure they were the state religion and their priests were a protected class while Jews were being persecuted.

NAZI Germany was Christian and endorsed by the Pope you absolute clown

I didn’t say sex was a spectrum

It helps if you read and comprehend the comment chain to understand what is being discussed before you jump in with ‘I didn’t say that’ when I never claimed you did.

I don’t see why it’s so hard for you to actually read the comment chain. It is right there. You can re-read it at any time.

You can’t believe people would be angry that someone illegally kept an animal an forced it to perform for his own profit?

You must be really unfamiliar with the history of animals in circus performances.

One that was being kept illegally? Probably worth a fine

The newer vaccine is far less painful and even then, there’s not much that’s as bad as rabies.

You want to avoid rabies harder than anything other than being immolated… and really that still might be preferable because it is faster.

She’s in the passenger seat, you can see the car in the background is also right hand drive

I think I was fairly clear, it is a binary system that has some rare exceptions.

Saying sex is a binary is saying there are only males and only females.

In healthy examples of mammals where development has occurred normally this is true.

This whole ‘its a spectrum’ argument is like saying humans aren’t bipedal, there’s a spectrum because some people are born without legs! It doesn’t make any sense.

That doesn’t mean that society should refuse to accept, include and support people born without the ability to walk.

their existence proves that sex isn’t just a binary.

This argument has always struck me as odd as in virtually every other discussion we would accept that the exception ‘proves the rule’.

Humans have two hands, except when they don’t due to something impacting fetal development.

Humans have two kidneys, except when they don’t due to an error in fetal development or as a result of disease or injury.

There’s diversity to sex that requires a more complicated scheme to account for everybody.

Or just let the exceptions be exceptions with no social stigma rather than refusing to recognise that the vast majority of humans, and mammals, can be accurately identified as one of two distinct sexes.

You still haven’t admitted the claim they came from some rocks is bullshit. You just keep dodging like the terminally online redditor you really are.

Seriously turn the computer and phone off and go touch some grass.

Seriously? Punching down because I pointed out how unscientific claims should not be repeated as if they hold any weight?

Maybe just accept that they have a belief that doesn’t make sense, since it isn’t hurting anyone.

No. Treating idiotic claims as if they had any merit because you see them as harmless is dangerous. All misinformation is harmful.

Unlike the racist

I know this is super difficult for you to comprehend because of how terminally online you are but I never disputed that Hancock is a racist. That isn’t even an argument that is happening outside of your head.

I know you’re the most terminally online person on lemmy (and second is a distant place) but get some perspective please. I suggest you touch grass.

I like how you continue to dodge the fact the indigenous peoples claims they come from a fucking rock is ridiculous when I have already agreed that Hancock is a con man.

So it’s bullshit, which granted it is pretty harmless, but it’s still bullshit when discussing the origins of people.

It doesn’t deserve to be repeated in an article about someone denying science. That claim also denies science (and common sense).

Hancock is a con man plain and simple but what part of that makes this more acceptable?

The Hopi people have lived in or near the Grand Canyon for at least 2,000 years and claim a sacred site inside the canyon as their place of emergence.

at his happy dance?

You mean the idiotic cavorting of a dipshit who thinks he’s being handed the power to write regulations for his own companies and fuck over the workers who actually produce the value?

I have been calling for the left wing to do this in Australia for years.

We will not beat these weirdo dipshits by pretending they aren’t weirdo dipshits.

Calling them out with direct language at every opportunity is the path to victory.

Honestly Korean brands are just not options anymore, between the ads from LG and Samsung, and the spying by Hyundai and Kia there’s simply no reason to buy their products.

“Male” and “female” are, biologically speaking, not distinct and mutually exclusive categories in humans.

They are and you repeating a claim without evidence does nothing.

Sexual dimorphism is real and artificial means of changing or replicating some parts of sexual dimorphism does not invalidate the underlying biology at play.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism

Male and female are so indistinguishable that it’s possible to identify them by their pelvis alone.

It’s a term coined by bigots to misgender trans people

Unfortunate origins aside male is jot a gender and therefore not misgendering. Biological man is misgendering.

What do you think will be the outcome of arguing that sex and gender are the same? That’s literally the side of the argument you have chosen.

Either they’re separate and gender can be changed or they’re the same… and you disagree with trans rights.