Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article. Shaken baby syndrome was fabricated by a handful of iffy doctors and has never been substantiated. Child abuse prosecutors have clung to it and propped it up because it makes for (inaccurate) open and shut convictions. Very few symptoms in the medical field are as cut and dry as what SBS claims is true.
This also ain’t news.
Silence brand
Is this world news tho? Feels a bit like Dutch news.
“existence of YouTube makes world a little bit dumber”
Blocked and downlemmied for clickbait-ass title.
I almost never have to mess with it once I got it running. Very occasionally I have to turn off blocking for a minute to access a website that is being served by an ad server, but this is easy. There is a web interface that you can use on your phone web browser with an option to pause blocking for 30 seconds or 5 minutes.
It has never broken or had a bad update or something and blocked my whole Internet. Good reliable set up and forget software. Been running it for years.
We’re not voting for them because they’re good, we’re voting for them because they aren’t the worst human on earth.
Another reason for pi-hole! The spot where my tv shows ads is just an empty box. Very satisfying.
“you’re what’s wrong with the Internet”
Proceeds to do the stupid thing making the Internet bad
You’re right, another Trump presidency would be way better for black Americans.
Yes but you see, 2,000 years ago God told some random dudes to write a book that says almost nothing about abortion, which of course means today that abortion is very very bad and we should never do it. It’s important that we write our laws keeping in mind what God told these guys 2,000 years ago, even though the book they wrote doesn’t actually say abortion is wrong.
I verify this.
Is this news or clickbait garbage?
I did not want to know about the media coverage.
Testimony under oath is evidence. Federal rules of evidence article VI. If a court finds it credible (as the court did here), it is evidence. Not being familiar with the law is no excuse to spread incorrect information about whether or not the former president is a rapist.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=is+testimony+evidence+us+law
Say it with me - there is substantiated evidence that Donald Trump is a rapist.
Testimony under oath is evidence. Federal rules of evidence article VI. If a court finds it credible (as the court did here), it is evidence. Not being familiar with the law is no excuse to spread incorrect information about whether or not the former president is a rapist.
I did not say or infer that. I’m only responding to the “no rape kit = no rape” statement. No perspective on media coverage or fitness for presidency is intended to be inferred.
I don’t have a problem with their estimation of the odds of winning an election. I have a problem with them dismissing any insinuation that the proven rapist is a proven rapist unless and until they see a rape kit or a video of a rape. That is some pre-Me Too, but what was she wearing, ignorant ass rapist apologist garbage and I won’t not call it out. Trump is a rapist. There is evidence. Judges and Juries of the United States have decided this, even without having to rely on a video or rape kit!
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18418220/carroll-v-trump/
Pretty straightforward, if you’re racist and/or hate poor people you vote in favor.