Toxicity drives engagement. Engagement means more ad views.
As long as profits are the motive it’s a flawed design.
My opinion of humanity was already so low…
The actual fuck? That’s disgusting.
Can’t imagine my tax dollars subsidizing their ignorance - yikes.
You really have to wonder where the breaking point is at this point.
The sciences are really my last bastion of hope these days. I’m constantly amazed at the rate of discovery these days and how they at least show a glimmer of hope for the future.
Do we know that though? I’m genuinely just curious because it seems to me like it would be at least somewhat diminished.
Has this been studied? I’d be very curious to see how much the risk is diminished.
I never got the negative connotation with that. Like are we all pretending that curry doesn’t smell amazing now?
To be fair I don’t see any long range munitions on that list
She crushed the debate. She learned from the mistakes that Hillary made IMO and handled him like the child he is. The fact that she managed to hook him with the rallies was fantastic.
Now I’m sitting here on the toilet wondering how many otters I could take on…
We all must be missing something. This is too obviously the path forward for there not to be some sort of issue with implementing it ASAP.
I won’t use them again. It’s morally questionable to support that business model during a global housing crisis.
Wait, are we acting like YouTube isn’t profitable now? If I’m going to spend money on videos it’ll be a content creator owner platform like Nebula
I’m just glad someone is thinking of the shareholders
Coming from the guy who demanded tens of billions in bonuses from Tesla shareholders in order to ‘stay motivated’.
Yeah, he was a thin skinned dick earlier on. But compared to now? He’s basically a raging racist asshole. I get your point though, it was always there
Ya love to see it!