Would be nice to think so, but apparently they’re Trumpers.

I feel like, if demons were real, they’d be perfectly happy with Tucker.

I’m not going to say I’m okay with that privacy policy, so not reading the article, but the original complaint is quite a read.

At my company, is have to tell that guy he can’t wear that hat because we don’t allow people to wear political stuff. I’m not a fan of dress codes, but I’m a fan of that one.

I still think we’re taking past each other. I’m not saying he won’t become president or whatever. There are other people who have done that without personally being great strategists or especially bright. I think Cheney was a lot smarter than the president he served under. Vance might be smarter than Trump, but I don’t think that’s saying much.

Cheney wanted to start a war in the middle east for personal enrichment, and he made that happen. That’s a huge deal, especially given he was just VP. Yes, terrible for the country, but really quite an accomplishment. I have seen no evidence that Vance has skills beyond just saying what he thinks people want to hear (regardless of accuracy).

Maybe I didn’t communicate well. I agree they’re both openly corrupt opportunists. The difference is that Cheney is also a good strategist.

If Cheney wasn’t evil and corrupt, he could have made a really positive impact on the country. Vance doesn’t have any useful qualities that I can see, unless you value shamelessness.

No, Cheney was a top-notch strategist. Evil, but smart. Vance is just an opportunist with no morals.

Pretty sure the drop in pregnancies under 19 was 50% of the overall drop, not 100%. That’s still huge, but it’s not the whole story.

You know, I’ve had this debate with other managers at work. One was incensed because he got a resume that listed being a raid leader, and thought it was ridiculous. I told him I used to be a WoW raid leader and, even though it’s a game, it requires explaining encounters to people who might not be familiar with them, getting ten or more people to follow a game plan, staying calm when things aren’t going to plan, and a whole lot of other skills that are useful in the workplace. I’ve never thought to put it on my own resume, but I think it’s pretty valid.

I review a lot of resumes. When it’s for someone right out of school or very early career, it makes sense for them to include things like fast food work or retail. But it seems really strange when someone with decades of relevant experience (I hire software engineers) includes it.

Ugh, I started in the middle of June last year and I have over 3K. Apparently I have no life.

We will never be zero COVID, but the pandemic crisis is over. Hospitals aren’t overcrowded to the breaking point, the vaccines are pretty effective, and it’s much less deadly. We’re managing it like the flu. None of that was true under Trump.

I’m wondering if people are confused about your comment because they are missing the fact that Musk is literally an African American (American now, originally from Africa).

Ah, okay, thanks

People say a lot of things. I can’t begin to grasp your motives.

I think you have an agenda to push Trump - no clue what your motives are.

I’m a manager at a large aerospace and defense company. We had a hybrid arrangement where most people (who didn’t have to touch hardware) could work from home a couple days a week. Most people seemed to think it was pretty reasonable. There really are benefits to in person collaboration, so some on site days seemed to make sense.

We recently moved to fully RTO, and I find it frustrating. It’s not a big deal personally - I live close and I’m older - but it pisses off a lot of the employees, who see no good reason for it. I don’t see any notable productivity increase moving from three to five days on site, it just makes my management job harder.

And you realize that a hunk of his popularity is because of blatant, I mean extremely blatant, propaganda, right? You have outlets like Fox refusing to run anything negative and continuing to air verifiably false information, and they aren’t the worst offender, just the most popular.

You could have said the exact same stuff about the climate deniers. Almost half of people believed them, so they couldn’t be wrong. It’s just an opinion that they’re harmful. There’s nothing illegal about airing their nonsense.

Again, you do you, but let’s be up front about what you’re about here.

Okay, so you really are like those news organizations giving the air time to climate deniers. “Just airing the opposing view,” even though that view is bullshit and destructive.

Got it, thanks for the clarification.