• FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 天前

    Really? Jeez. Last I heard, evidently incorrectly, was a few dollars at best. That explains their ghoulishness somewhat.

    Even so, Facebook brings in enormous profit. Evidently a result of maximizing whatever they can get away with

    I’m wondering what the costs are to cover just hosting / content delivery.

    Ie, is it feasible at some point that a not-for-profit social platform comes about. Or a for profit one that promotes itself as ethical and subsequently charges premium users based on running costs + moderate profit rather than pushing every kind of manipulative behaviour it can get away with just to maximise ad value.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      It’s certainly possible. If we the people cared enough about the impact of social media on society we would demand funding from our government, if only in the form of a grant or similar.

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        I’m wondering how long it’ll be till social media is basically a ‘solved problem’. As in, there becomes available a foss clone of Facebook (or whatever) that’s close enough to be useable and enjoyable. If such a thing were set up with ads design need to cover costs not maximise profit (and therefore there aren’t as many) or with a reasonable priced ad free tier that covers costs and only a modest profit then would people possibly be attracted to such an “ethical” offering?